AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jocelyn Flores

MATH027 · MA2202 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Consider her if you like group work and stay on top of homework; avoid if .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGroup work heavyCaring but unevenHands-onDisorganized onlineExpects prior algebra
  • mixed on clarity, with praise for patience and hands-on help versus criticism for .
  • Group projects and Kahoot-style participation are central; online setup felt split into too many parts.
  • Risky for students returning to math after a long break.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One A and one B appear with effort, but and catch-up can feel impossible.

Online student earned an A; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content is standard college math difficulty, harsher if algebra is rusty.

Online felt easier (difficulty 2); .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

Same across online and in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Would-take-again is low (25%) with one strong yes, one strong no, and two neutrals.

In-person has the only explicit yes and no; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Described as fair and patient by one student; and heavy papers can still hurt.

Format shift

Limited sample; online .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, and group work create a moderate but busy load.

Format shift

Online called out many multi-part assignments; in-person notes so many papers.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Hands-on and patient for some; others feel she relies on students to teach each other.

Format shift

In-person has both strong praise and a ; online is mixed on organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and tests all matter.

Format shift

Online emphasizes Kahoot and multi-part tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ranges from hands-on last-minute fill-in teaching to a .

Main concern

; hard to catch up if behind.

What students said

“She was really hands-on with her teaching which helped me understand the lessons.”
MATH027
“She doesn't bother to explain a problem she makes the .”
MA2202
“ and fair.”
MATH027

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online MATH felt caring with Kahoot and group work but and tests.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Loves group work which can be hit or miss because you're graded as a group, not individually.”
MATH027

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and participation matter; .

Multi-part testsGroup projectsKahoot participation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

beyond general homework and classwork expectations.

Homework heavy
“I probably not pass her class but was my fault for missing so many homeworks to turned in.”
MATH027

Online

Online tests and ; Kahoot was main participation tool.

Multi-part testsKahootGroup grading
“every assignment, discussion board, and ”
MATH027

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you have trouble with math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in-person), highlighting group work and uneven support. Credibility rating: Low.

🤝 Group Work Focus

55/100

“Loves group work which can be hit or miss because you're graded as a group, not individually.”

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“ and fair.”

⚠️ Catch-Up Risk

25/100

“If you're behind it feels almost impossible to catch up.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really hands-on with her teaching
  • Did a kahoot every lecture
  • makes the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • for people who understand Algebra
  • missing so many homeworks

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Prof. Is caring
  • and fair
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews across years with group work and uneven support.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH0273 reviews
MA22021 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1