AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Oegie Briones

MATH29 · MATH27 · MATH030 · MATH025N · MATH025 · MATH012 · MATH30 · MATH155 · MATH029 · MATH027 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you already learn math well independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTests mismatch lessonsTough graderRushes and skips stepsSelf-teach via YouTubePolarizing math experience
  • Many students say exams and .
  • Teaching pace and .
  • A minority succeed by participating heavily and treating the class as high-effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong effort can fail if ; only highly engaged students report As.

Both formats report hard grading; a few online and participation.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Pace is fast, steps are skipped, and students often must re-teach themselves the content.

; in person still feels rushed and test-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass, with limited outside help windows.

; in person is treated as mandatory for survival.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and many reviews .

Negatives dominate both formats, though a if you grind and participate.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students call him a the grade far more than completed work helps.

Format shift

In person and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and test prep consume free time and leave little margin if you fall behind.

Format shift

Online and accelerated .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Common complaints are rushing, skipping steps, mismatched tests, and sending students to YouTube instead of clarifying.

Format shift

A few students still find him friendly with corny jokes when they already keep up.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and quizzes dominate outcomes and often feel disconnected from reviews or study guides.

Format shift

Same pattern online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

reviews, he rushes, and gets annoyed when asked to slow down; a few students who retook and participated earned As.

Main concern

Misaligned exams and .

What students said

“ ! He is a horrible professor. His test are very very different from lessons and reviews.”
MATH-155
“He gives study guides that do NOT align with the .”
MATH30
“Took it again, paided better attention in class and PARTICIPATED. Passed with an A.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experiences range from self-taught worksheets with to long Zoom classes with limited office hours; several students still struggled.

Main concern

Weak and .

What students said

“There were , no book chapters , and due dates. I had to with YouTube and Khan Academy.”
MATH025N
“his teaching methods are so horrible and makes students feel dumb. the amount of homework and ”
MATH30
“ and you'll pass.”
MATH029

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high stakes and frequently described as unrelated to lessons or review materials.

Test-heavyStudy guides misalignedHard quizzesRetakes over Zoom sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reviews do not match tests and he rushes through solutions.

Misaligned study guidesRushed lecturesTough exams
“ and reviews.”
MATH-155
“He gives study guides that do NOT align with the .”
MATH30

Online

Online comments mention , and little instructional support.

Test heavyZoom retakes in some coursesSelf-taught worksheets
“There are and meeting with him for extra help.”
MATH025N
“hes a and expects u to already understand the content hes teaching.”
MATH30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He is a horrible professor. His test are very very different from lessons and reviews.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (6 online, 9 in , and polarized outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Concerns

34/100

“He teaches as if you should already know what you're doing, shows little work/steps with problems.”

🧪

28/100

“He gives study guides that do NOT align with the .”

📉 Recommendation

32/100

“If you .”

🔁 Minority Success Path

55/100

“Do the homework and participate and you'll pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he rushes through the lecture, he skips steps
  • He will constantly refer you to YouTube
  • its hard to understand him sometimes. and he works too fast.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and reviews
  • grade by 0.3 % or less but drops by 8
  • hes a

Theme 3

🧭 Who Survives

  • Took it again, paided better attention in class and PARTICIPATED. Passed with an A
  • and you'll pass
  • Stay on top of your work so you don't fall behind or you will not pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

15 reviews with mixed detail and years of coverage; but sample is smaller and more polarized.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH305 reviews
MATH0292 reviews
MATH-1551 review
MATH0121 review
MATH0251 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH025N1 review
MATH0271 review
MATH0301 review
MATH271 review
MATH291 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 2