AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Joghinda Gangar

MATH034028 · MATH25 · MATH034 · MATH30 · MATH140 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
84.62%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a and gives fair, predictable exams.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringAccessible outside classPractice tests match examsPatient explanationsWants students to succeed
  • Students repeatedly call him one of the
  • and office-hour help is strong
  • Course is doable with

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

As and A-minuses are and practice exams, but math140 tests can still sting.

Single online review reports an easy A+; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Stats and intermediate algebra stay college-level, and matched practice tests.

In-person MATH140 is harder for some; lower courses and one online summer felt easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Many sections expect if .

; in person often expects presence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Roughly 85 percent would retake and comments gush about care, clarity, and success for weak math students.

Both the one online review and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students mention work accepted, and fair criteria.

Format shift

Mostly in-person evidence; online also felt student-friendly.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Online and in-class homework exist and can pile up if you procrastinate, but volume is not the main complaint.

Format shift

In person sometimes has end-of-semester due dates; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

and strong outside-class access.

Format shift

Excellent in the one online review and across almost all in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Homework and labs feed into multiple midterms and a .

Format shift

Same structure appears online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person students praise patience, clear expectations, and or .

Main concern

A and the guides.

What students said

“Professor Gangar is the .”
MATH034
“He really wants his students to succeed and ”
MATH140
“This class was extremely difficult, overall their are 3 midterms and 1 final.”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One summer online review calls the class a breeze with excellent access and practice tests.

Main concern

Only one online review, so online rigor and .

What students said

“I took this class online during the summer, and it was a breeze. This is my first college class and he made the .”
MATH034

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are well scaffolded with , and .

Practice tests very similarOne page of notesExam retakes to CTake-home test sometimesCumulative final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams often allow a notes page, follow practice tests closely, and .

Practice exam very closeOne page of notesRetakes to C3 midterms and finalHomework matches tests
“he gives a practice exam which is VERY close to the .”
MATH034
“If you fail an the grade to a C.”
MATH034
“ and , and he allowed 1 page of notes for each test.”
MATH25

Online

The sole online review says practice tests are very similar to actual tests and the course felt easy.

Practice tests very similarAccessible help until 8 pm
“he gives practice tests very very similar to the actual tests.”
MATH034

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Gangar is the . I have always struggled with this subject but with his guidance and patience I was able to actually understand the material and pass the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews (1 online, 19 in , and beginner support. Credibility rating: Medium.

⭐ Teaching Quality

90/100

“One of the !!”

👍

88/100

“ if you have the chance!!”

📝 Fair Exams

82/100

“he gives practice tests very very similar to the actual tests.”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“Really cares about his students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and easy to understand
  • Fantastic teacher and .

Theme 2

📈

  • which is VERY close to the exam
  • The final is 9 pages long and consists of everything
  • As long as you do all the homework and do great.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and funny so it made it less stres
  • he actually cares about his students
  • Overall a good guy and late work was accepted.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty mostly detailed and highly consistent reviews support strong teaching claims, though the online sample is only one.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH03411 reviews
MATH1403 reviews
MATH253 reviews
MATH302 reviews
MATH0340281 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

5

B 3 · B- 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1