AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jennifer Saito

HUMAN30 · PHIL041 · PHIL210 · STAT34 · MATH34 · MATH250 · PHIL40 · MATH50 · MATH210 · MATH75 · PHIL41 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Great for motivated math learners who like energy; think hard before taking her humanities seminars.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingTough GraderEnergetic LecturerTest HeavyHumanities Harsh
  • Math students often love her energy and
  • Humanities/Paris sections draw strong complaints , and vague tests
  • Not an easy A; exams and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades lean B more than A, with and papers; students say it is not an easy A.

Online math can still yield solid grades with work; in-person humanities is harsher.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

keep content demanding.

Math difficulty is expected rigor; humanities difficulty often feels unstructured.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and warn that missing class costs notes and points.

Online and ; sparse notes amplify the cost of absences.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; many humanities students urge avoidance.

Online math lean positive; recent in-person HUMAN30 reviews are sharply negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and exam-heavy math rubrics.

Format shift

Math has and notecards; and less transparent.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and reading across both math and humanities courses.

Format shift

Online math adds frequent quizzes and worksheets; .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Highly energetic and clear for many math students, but humanities students report poor guidance and sparse notes.

Format shift

Online calc praise is high; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

and quiz heavy; humanities .

Format shift

Math online and ; humanities also piles papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, while recent HUMAN30 reviews call the , and brutally graded.

Main concern

, and hard-to-study exams.

What students said

“ ”
MATH50
“This is literally the .”
HUMAN30
“She is a , and expect the most random grade with .”
HUMAN30

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online math reviews are mostly positive on short lecture clips and clarity, with heavy quizzes and .

Main concern

, and heavy worksheet load.

What students said

“She broke up her online lectures into clips of max 5 mins which mads everting really digestible.”
MATH210
“ and her tests were pretty straightforward.”
MATH210
“she moves very fast through her lectures, gives a worksheet almost every class on top of ”
MATH75

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and hard to study for, .

Test HeavyNo Slide NotesNotecard on ExamsPop QuizzesWritten FinalsTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person math allows notecards and ; and heavy memorization with little review.

Notecard AllowedExams Dominate GradeImage-Based ExamsNo ReviewWritten Final
“82.5% of exams + 10 on each.”
MATH250
“She gives you a picture with no words on an exam and expects you to know everything behind it.”
HUMAN30
“NO REVIEW, just a sheet with 100 different things to study and only 7 was on the final and it was written!”
PHIL041

Online

Online math includes many quizzes and straightforward but ; .

Many QuizzesStraightforward TestsHeavy Homework
“There are also 10 quizzes, which is excessive for a linear algebra class.”
MATH75
“ .”
MATH210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, contrasting math praise with humanities complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ .”

⚠️ Humanities Warning

20/100

“Literally the .”

🧮 Math Strength

90/100

“ as well). T A K E H E R.”

📝

28/100

“She is a , and expect the most random grade with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very energetic and
  • Her lectures are very interactive and entertaining
  • Little to no words on the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A
  • Each exam was like 30% of your grade

Theme 3

💔 Polarized Outcomes

  • I loved professor Saito

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

34 reviews over many years with a and detailed recent criticism of humanities sections.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HUMAN309 reviews
MATH509 reviews
MATH2103 reviews
PHIL0413 reviews
PHIL2103 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH752 reviews
MATH2501 review
MATH341 review
PHIL401 review
PHIL411 review
STAT341 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

11

A 8 · A- 3

B range

12

B+ 4 · B 8

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1