AI Rate Professor

Art

Justin Nogarr

ART005 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you want a writing-heavy history course and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWriting heavy art classInsane reading loadTough graderBusywork overloadEnglish class in disguise
  • ART005 is repeatedly described as an English or history writing course, not a studio art class.
  • Workload is extremely high with , and museum papers.
  • Feedback is often thin or harsh, and communication positives.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students still earn As, but only after heavy weekly writing and .

Most A and grade-struggle evidence comes from online reviews; the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Entry-level art becomes a and constant notes.

Online reviews dominate this picture; the .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

Most online students say attendance is not required, though .

Online reviews mostly mark attendance optional; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Students commonly warn others to pick a different professor because of workload and .

Avoid language is strongest online; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Students report , and .

Format shift

; in-person review also calls him very strict.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

, and museum papers make the class feel far above a 3-credit load.

Format shift

Both online and in-person students emphasize an extreme writing and reading load.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

A few note decent communication, but , and class design.

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed on communication but mostly negative overall; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and projects rather than traditional art-making exams.

Format shift

Online reviews list essays and notes in detail; and book reports.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review also frames ART005 as literature-like, with , and strict expectations.

Main concern

Strict writing load even in person.

What students said

“I dont think this is an art course the name should be changed to Literature b/c there are so ”
ART005

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ART005 reviews center on massive reading and , and a class that feels like English more than art.

Main concern

Huge essay and weekly note load with and .

What students said

“For an entry level art class, it was the work load of a high level english class.”
ART005
“ if you're not into art.”
ART005
“this is straight up a english class.”
ART005

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is dominated by papers and .

Essay heavyWeekly notesMuseum evaluation essayGroup essaySemester-long project

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and long book reports with very strict expectations.

Essay heavyBook reportsStrict writing load
“there are so much readings/ writing (+3 essays) book reports are +6 pages minimum and the instructor is VERY STRICT!”
ART005

Online

Online students describe weekly Cornell notes, multiple essays, group writing, and a .

Essay heavyWeekly notesGroup essayMuseum evaluation essay
“a , and chapter notes every single week.”
ART005
“If you miss one essay your grade will drop 2 letters and so its hard to raise your grade.”
ART005

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was a lot. For an entry level art class, it was the work load of a high level english class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (6 online, 1 in person), , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝 Writing Overload

16/100

“Feels more like an english class then anything.”

⚖️

26/100

“I went to an LMC , but he gave me a 72 with .”

📡 Communication Plus

55/100

“Honestly responded really quickly and communicated more so than a lot of teachers at LMC.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is not great with feedback.
  • Nogarr does a great job communicating esp. for online class.
  • No personality either

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 3 credit course felt like 5 for amount of time dedicated to do the work.
  • so its hard to raise your grade.
  • he'll take off 5-15 points for no reason.

Theme 3

📚 About Course Design

  • its more a history of visual elements lots of
  • If you're wanting to create or draw look elsewhere it's textbook heavy.
  • the name should be changed to Literature

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent, detailed reviews are highly consistent on workload and writing intensity, though almost all are from one course.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART0057 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3