AI Rate Professor

Health

Lenea Pollett

NUTRI55 · NUTRI3510 · NUTRI055 · NUTRO55 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
4.76%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Do not enroll if you have any other option; students repeatedly say this class risks GPA and mental health.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnclear assignmentsTest heavyPoor communicationQuizzes mismatch lectures
  • and zeros for minor mistakes.
  • Assignments and quizzes frequently described as .
  • Communication and tech issues compound stress online and in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even strong students report Fs and zeros for , and .

Both online and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Nutrition content is not inherently advanced, but and misaligned quizzes make the course feel much harder than peers.

Online students especially stress quiz-lecture mismatch; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and late arrivals can miss locked-door quizzes with zeros.

In-person reports of locked doors and hours still matter for credit.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Would-take-again is about 5 percent, with a flood of run-away warnings across years and formats.

Negative consensus is consistent online and in person, with only rare brighter outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

; students cite zeros for minor errors and no leeway on late or emergency work.

Format shift

lenient counter-evidence.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, papers, timed quizzes, projects, and .

Format shift

Online and in-person both call the course work-heavy and quiz-heavy.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students widely report unclear teaching, poor tech, weak communication, and little help despite occasional passion comments.

Format shift

Online navigation problems and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Weekly quizzes and , though papers and food diaries also matter.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

late quiz days, unclear rubrics, and perceived lack of care for students.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“DO NOT ENROLL IN THIS COURSE.”
NUTRI055
“ .”
NUTRI55

Remote format

Online

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students , and harsh grading that often lead to drops.

Main concern

Quiz content and module alignment fail while support is hard to get.

What students said

“ .”
NUTRI055
“ ”
NUTRI055

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and frequently said not to match lectures or modules.

Timed quizzesTest heavyContent mismatchNo makeup flexibility

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

doors for late arrivals, and quizzes poorly tied to lectures.

Weekly quizzesPop quizzesLocked door for late arrivals
“She would lock the door on students on if showing up late.”
NUTRI055
“Quizes not related whatsoever to lectures as she states”
NUTRI055

Online

Online students report timed quizzes with many questions, mismatched modules, and posts that sometimes fail to appear.

Timed quizzesModule mismatchNo clear proctoring details stated
“Her quizzes are also TIMED 15 minutes for 17 QUESTIONS!!??”
NUTRI055
“I studied every learning objective she placed and none of it was on the Quiz.”
NUTRI055

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT ENROLL IN THIS COURSE.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 , and avoid consensus. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

8/100

“Warning!!! !”

📉

10/100

“She will not hesitate to give you a straight 0 if you did a little mistake on one of the assignments.”

🧩

18/100

“ unfair grader”

Theme 1

⚠️

  • DO NOT ENROLL IN THIS COURSE.
  • Save your GPA & mental health!

Theme 2

🧪

  • the corresponding module
  • PowerPoint presentations never align with quiz content
  • weekly quizzes

Theme 3

📞 About Communication

  • Lacks communication skills

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-two detailed reviews from 2020-2026 across online and .

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 533

Course coverage

NUTRI05530 reviews
NUTRI557 reviews
NUTRI35103 reviews
NUTRO552 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 6

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 7