AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Julio Guerrero-Gonzalez

MATH220 · MATH34 · MATH034 · MATH155 · MATH110 · MATH210 · MATH1102291 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
47.62%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want engaging math lectures; unless you are ready to self-teach.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOnline DisorganizedCaring In PersonLots of HomeworkSlow GradingHilarious Lectures
  • , and caring support.
  • Online students report , and self-teaching.
  • ; success requires independent work especially online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

As are possible with and studying, but and heavy work make an A far from free.

In person reports lighter workload and practice exams; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Calc and stats content is standard college math difficulty with a fast pace in some support sections.

Online students more often call material harder because lectures fail to cover assigned work.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

as optional, but several students say missing lectures makes the class much harder.

Both formats mostly list optional attendance, with a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

, but many online experiences are poor enough that overall take-again is mixed.

In-person reviews lean yes; online reviews are largely negative or non-committal.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some late-work flexibility and feedback, but .

Format shift

Online and incomplete; in person notes more deadline leniency.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of homework and lecture questions appear across courses, with some online students reporting 25+ hour weeks.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are stronger; some in-person students call the load light with practice exams.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

videos and weak email responsiveness.

Format shift

In-person quality is mostly high; online quality is mostly low.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Heavy homework plus tests, with practice exams and .

Format shift

and test-heavy tags; in person mentions flash cards and practice exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe him as caring, hilarious, and strong at explaining concepts, with notes and some accommodations.

Main concern

Some still note disorganization and .

What students said

“Julio is really good at explaining math concepts to non-math majors and his lectures were well developed.”
MATH210
“Chill and fun teacher, lenient on deadlines.”
Math220
“his lectures were really good he walks you through everything during the lectures”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel disorganized with lecture videos that , and .

Main concern

Assignments and videos often do not match, and large portions of .

What students said

“There's lecture videos that don't match the homework.”
Math220
“Nearly 40-50% of .”
MATH210
“I had to commit 25+ hrs each week (much outside research being done).”
Math220

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard college math tests; and limited notes support.

Practice examsTest correctionsFlash cards for examsTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students mention practice exams that , and a flash card on exams.

Practice examsTest correctionsFlash cards for exams
“practice exams were given that .”
Math220
“I like how he gives you a flash card for the exams”
MATH155

Online

and homework that does not match lecture videos; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Test heavyHomework-exam mismatch
“He gave us questions that he never went over in his lectures and we were given A LOT of hw.”
Math220

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Chill and fun teacher, lenient on deadlines. Show up, make sure you actually learn the material and you'll pass just fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews (9 online, 12 in person), highlighting format-split teaching quality and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

56/100

“Julio is really good at explaining math concepts to non-math majors and his lectures were well developed.”

💻 Online Experience Risk

28/100

“Had to almost everything as and were rarely properly scheduled.”

📚

34/100

“SO MUCH Lecture Q's/hw, & doesn't match the video .”

❤️ Caring Persona

78/100

“I took Dr. G for my spring semester in 2024 his an amazing and caring teacher, and hilarious.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures were really good he walks you through everything
  • Amazing teacher, one of the few classes I've taken where I could sit through long lectures
  • Lecture videos suck as he makes mistakes & doesn't go over questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show up, make sure you actually learn the material and you'll pass just fine
  • he's a
  • It was the hardest class in my entire life!

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization

  • Nearly 40-50% of
  • .
  • He is a , and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

21 detailed reviews span 2016-2025 with and consistent themes.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

Math2207 reviews
MATH1554 reviews
MATH1103 reviews
MATH0342 reviews
MATH2102 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH342 reviews
MATH11022911 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1