AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bauea Crosby

MATH030 · MATH0120091 · MATH25 · GEOMETRY1 · MATH026 · MATH1102291 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless and track your own grade without reliable feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedSelf-taught classUnclear explanationsLate gradesYouTube lectures
  • Students across years say they largely teach themselves with .
  • Grading and , so students often do not know where they stand.
  • ; and in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even students who pass describe confusion, vague work, and .

Both online and and ; online adds worse communication.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content becomes much harder because and self-study.

In-person and online both describe poor teaching that inflates difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

if lectures do not teach clearly.

In-person and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Would-take-again is effectively zero; comments .

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report , and finals not counted after mass fails.

Format shift

Online reviews stress late or missing grades; .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of homework and rushed mastery quizzes force heavy outside study to compensate for weak lectures.

Format shift

Workload complaints appear mainly in older in-person reviews; online .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Near-universal low quality scores describe unorganized teaching, YouTube class time, and ignored questions.

Format shift

Both formats rate teaching quality near the bottom.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Tests and mastery quizzes weigh heavily while instructional support is weak.

Format shift

; online mentions unexplained exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person classes are described as , with students relying on the math lab and often failing to understand lessons.

Main concern

Poor lesson clarity and .

What students said

“The ! She just shows YouTube videos during classes.”
MATH110-2291
“Her lectures are lightening fast, won't matter to her if it up online.”
MATH25

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report vague assignments, ignored questions, wrong answers from the instructor, and grades posted late or never explained.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ if . She posts page and question numbers with no context and no way to submit.”
MATH026
“Shell ask you to look it up online. .”
GEOMETRY1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are poorly explained and graded inconsistently, creating high stress with low guidance.

Unexplained examsMastery quizzesLate or missing gradesTough grader

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, with tough grading and little clarity on standing until late in term.

Mastery quizzesTest heavyGrades entered late
“1 week after being introduced to a new Unit, we're already taking a Mastery Quiz.”
MATH25
“You have to basically guess your grade because she only entered grades during the last 2 weeks.”
MATH026

Online

Online students say exams are never explained and grades may not show what was wrong or arrive on time.

Never explains examsLate grade submissionNo feedback on wrong answers
“ . Youre lucky If she grades it, but she wont tell you what you got wrong.”
GEOMETRY1
“Grades incorrectly.”
MATH026

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The ! She just shows YouTube videos during classes. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (2 online, 5 in , and avoid consensus. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ !”

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Easily the . She either doesn't know what she is doing, or doesn't care.”

📚

15/100

“The whole class needed help in the .”

📉

22/100

“she also never submits grades on time so youll be guessing your grade the entire way.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just shows YouTube videos during classes
  • as she was rushing through the lessons
  • Shell ask you to look it up online

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Everyone failed because she was so unorganized
  • You have to basically guess your grade
  • Grades incorrectly

Theme 3

💔 About Support

  • Doesn't answer questions sent in
  • if you don't get it, then too bad
  • professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven consistently negative reviews span 2016-2025 across online and in person, though the sample is modest.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH0262 reviews
GEOMETRY11 review
MATH01200911 review
MATH0301 review
MATH110-22911 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH251 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1