AI Rate Professor

English

Alexander Sterling

ENG221 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you already write strongly and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderVague essay feedbackHeavy researchMany papersHard to satisfy
  • and heavy research demands
  • and unhelpful
  • Students respect him personally but struggle to improve grades

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students earn C range grades despite heavy research and revision effort; .

Both online and in person report C+/C- with high difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

, and extreme research expectations make the course intellectually and workload hard.

Online stresses research volume; in .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

Both reviews mark attendance not mandatory for ENG221.

Evidence is consistent across the one online and one in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Would-take-again is 0% where stated; students do and .

; in person leaves take-again blank but is not enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader tags and .

Format shift

Same pattern online and in person.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

So many papers and heavy research requirements create a heavy writing load.

Format shift

Online emphasizes research volume; in .

Teaching experience

Average

40/100

Respected as a person but .

Format shift

In person notes respect as a professor; online focuses on unhelpful improvement guidance.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment centers on research essays and drafts rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper and research driven; no exams are described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person he is respected as a person but so students need outside help.

Main concern

.

What students said

“the is in my opinion extremely vague, with no information regarding what you can do better.”
ENG221

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENG221 demands heavy research and many papers; grade.

Main concern

Insane research load and .

What students said

“He makes you do an insane amount of research. I sited 8 things for my essay and he didnt even think it was enough.”
ENG221

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not describe traditional exams; assessment is essay and research based, so .

Essay focusedResearch intensiveRough draft feedback

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No traditional exams described; .

Essay rough draftsVague written feedback
“the is in my opinion extremely vague”
ENG221

Online

No traditional exams described; .

Many papersHeavy research citations
“He is a hard professor to satisfy .”
ENG221

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a hard professor to satisfy .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews with and . Credibility rating: Low.

📝

25/100

“the is in my opinion extremely vague, with no information regarding what you can do better.”

📚 Research Overload

25/100

“He makes you do an insane amount of research.”

⚖️

22/100

“He is a hard professor to satisfy .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a hard professor to satisfy .
  • I sited 8 things for my essay and he didnt even think it was enough.

Theme 2

✍️

  • extremely vague, with no information regarding what you can do better
  • He doesnt give good feedback when he wants .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Sterling is a great guy and respect him as a professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews from 2021 and 2024; themes align but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG2212 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values