AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mara Landers

MATH030 · MATH40 · MATH0858 · MATH25 · MATH30 · MATH120 · MATH155 · MATH029 · MATH32 · MATH040 · MATH26 · MATH125 · MATH301173 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
44%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you have time for heavy weekly work and want a demanding but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringLots of HomeworkTough GraderAccessible Outside ClassPolarizing
  • Many , and willingness to help outside class.
  • and and stressful.
  • Opinions split hard between life-changing teacher and overwhelming or harsh experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible but , and tough grading standards.

Online reviews also stress heavy work; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Math content is manageable with practice, but .

Online MATH029 can feel easier for some, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

as mandatory or high-stakes, while others allow more flexibility.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students who value support and learning often recommend her, but many .

Online reviews lean more positive on care; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

, though she may allow revisions, late work, or second chances.

Format shift

; online sometimes feels slightly more flexible on late work.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of homework, papers, and .

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

, and helpful, though some find her confusing or arrogant.

Format shift

In-person reviews are more polarized; online reviews more often highlight care and accessibility.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Homework, papers, portfolios, and revisions drive .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is often praised as caring and structured, yet many call her a .

Main concern

Homework volume and is solid.

What students said

“Dr.Landers is the .”
MATH155
“her class is just way too overwhelming.”
MATH125
“ .”
MATH155

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections still feel caring and responsive, but the .

Main concern

Frequent assignments can overwhelm students juggling other classes.

What students said

“ !! She cares for her students and wants you to succeed.”
MATH029
“There are but she is always there to help and accepts late work!”
MATH120
“assigns about four things every two days”
MATH029

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams exist but comments and redo opportunities than proctoring style.

Homework RevisionsFlexible DeadlinesDetailed GradingTests Present

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and detailed answer expectations more than formal proctoring tools.

Tough Grading on TestsDetailed Answers RequiredHomework Redo Options
“She likes to use complicated wording in tests & assignments.”
MATH155
“If you don't do well on your homework or a with instructions on what she wants from you.”
MATH32

Online

Online comments rarely describe proctoring; , and late-work flexibility.

Easy QuizzesLots of AssignmentsLate Work Accepted
“ .”
MATH029
“She is .”
MATH029

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want a professor who really cares about their students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews across online and in-person formats, highlighting polarized care-versus-workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Care

68/100

“She cares for her students and goes out of her way to create the .”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“I found it very hard to keep up with all the .”

⚖️

36/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • so well and shows you new perspectives.
  • makes everything overly complicated

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • she grade extremely tough
  • if you are willing put in work, you will pass!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • one of the
  • She is arrogant
  • if you needed extra help outside of class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews spanning many years and courses provide rich, mixed, and fairly consistent themes.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH0309 reviews
MATH1556 reviews
MATH0295 reviews
MATH1204 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH323 reviews
MATH0402 reviews
MATH252 reviews
MATH402 reviews
MATH08581 review
MATH261 review
MATH301 review
MATH3011731 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B- 2

C range

6

C 5 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3