AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Clayton Viertel

BUS187 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

expect a demanding BUS course and check current section format, since the two reviews completely conflict.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing StylePractice-Problem FocusHeavy Course LoadOffice Hours UnusedAccessibility Split
  • Only two reviews exist and they sharply disagree on teaching quality.
  • The course load is consistently described as heavy and dedication-heavy.
  • One student found him rude and passive-aggressive; the and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Both reviews frame success as requiring heavy dedication; one student dropped and neither describes an easy A.

Evidence is thin and split across one online and one in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Difficulty ratings and comments describe a heavy, problem-intensive accounting-style load.

Both formats call the course demanding despite opposite views of the instructor.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

.

Online and as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One strong yes and one strong dislike leave recommendation at a coin flip with almost no sample.

The sole online review is positive; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Too little grade detail to claim generosity; the course is graded by few things and rewards completion under pressure.

Format shift

Neither format clearly describes curves or .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Both students describe a heavy load needing dedication to assignments and practice.

Format shift

Online and in-person both signal substantial work despite different teaching opinions.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Scores of 1 and 5 cancel out: caring organized mentor versus rude passive-aggressive drill instructor.

Format shift

Online praise and review each.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Practice problems, modules, participation, and few graded items appear, without a .

Format shift

In-person emphasizes practice problems; online emphasizes modules and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person review calls the teaching horrendous, passive-aggressive, and problem-drill focused with little real lecture.

Main concern

Rude office-hour dynamic and weak lecture-to-practice bridge.

What students said

“Hated his class. Not a good instructor at all. His style of teaching is horrendous, expecting you to learn with three practice problems.”
BUS187

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online review praises organized modules, accessibility, creativity, and .

Main concern

and participation demands require real dedication.

What students said

“Professor Viertel is a dedicated instructor, he goes to and .”
BUS187

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment centers on practice and module work.

Practice ProblemsFew Graded ItemsParticipation

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review focuses on practice problems instead of full lectures; .

Practice ProblemsLecture Light
“He doesn't even go over the lecture just straight to practice problems.”
BUS187

Online

Online ; success is framed around assignments and participation.

ModulesParticipationAssignments
“The course itself is a heavy load and and participation to succeed.”
BUS187

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The course itself is a heavy load and and participation to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person), highlighting pure polarization and heavy load. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Polarized Teaching

50/100

“Hated his class. Not a good instructor at all.”

💪 Heavy Load

28/100

“The course itself is a heavy load and and participation to succeed.”

🤝 Accessibility Split

55/100

“he goes to and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His style of teaching is horrendous, expecting you to learn with three practice problems.
  • he has a lot of creativity and .
  • He's very passive aggressive.

Theme 2

📦 About Workload

  • heavy load and requires dedication
  • Graded by few things

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews years apart give low confidence for any firm conclusion.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BUS1872 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1