AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Bequia Sherick

PHIL041 · POLSC33 · PHIL133 · PHIL040 · PHIL40 · POLSC033 · PHIL100 · PHIL41 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
76%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you like philosophy and will keep up with reading; skip if you want a zero-effort GE.

Best fit · Effort For RewardReading HeavyClear LecturesExtra CreditFair but FirmParticipation Matters
  • Expect , and structured lecture support.
  • Most students recommend her and say .
  • Essay grading can be strict, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

As are common if , and use lectures, but and lazy work shows up as C-range grades.

Online and in-person both reward steady work; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but and some critical-thinking units raise the challenge.

Online students often call it easier when they rely on lecture videos instead of full primary texts.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Participation and presence matter in many sections, though some online and .

Online is more flexible; and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and most praise learning value despite the .

Online recommendations are especially strong; a and monotone delivery.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Quizzes and homework are straightforward, but ; curves and .

Format shift

Online essays called hard; curves.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Get-ready-to-read and , and multi-page papers.

Format shift

; online homework can feel lighter when lectures preview questions.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students , and passion-driven, with only occasional monotone complaints.

Format shift

Online lecture videos are a standout; demand.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly quizzes and , and multi-page essays.

Format shift

Online leans slightly more toward homework and papers; and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fair for philosophy, with lots of reading and participation; a few criticize monotone lectures or inflexibility in personal crises.

Main concern

and occasional lack of flexibility on missed work.

What students said

“lots and lots of reading. her !”
PHIL100
“She also gives out study guides for the midterm and .”
PHIL100
“Don't expect empathy or .”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise structured lecture videos that , and interesting content with a manageable workload if you stay current.

Main concern

Reading volume and .

What students said

“Attend her lectures! She literally goes over almost every homework question that's due the following week”
PHIL133
“All the lectures she posted went through the questions for the ”
POLSC033
“ average on both semester papers was a D.”
PHIL133

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments mix quizzes and standard exams with larger papers; study guides help but .

QuizzesMidterm and FinalStudy GuidesEssay Papers

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes; papers and presentations also carry weight.

Study GuidesPop QuizzesMidterm and FinalPapers and Presentations
“She also gives out study guides for the midterm and .”
PHIL100
“Class is almost entirely based on 3 tests, with a quiz each class and hmk assignment due each class.”
PHIL41

Online

Online students mention easy quizzes and midterms with harder graded essays and .

Lecture-Supported QuizzesEasy Midterm MentionsHard Essay Grading
“The quizzes are not that difficult, the .”
PHIL41
“ average on both semester papers was a D.”
PHIL133

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a gem!”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews (6 online, 22 in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Ms. Sherick is an awesome teacher. She really broke Philosophy down to a level I could understand.”

📚 Reading Load

36/100

“lots and lots of reading. her !”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ . Sherick”

⚖️

58/100

“The professor offers in the end of the semester and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She literally
  • her
  • Her voice was extremely monotone and the lectures were so boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You have to try to fail in her class
  • if you do read the assigned parts, youll do well

Theme 3

📖 About Workload

  • Get ready to READ!
  • lots and lots of reading
  • There was a lot of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

28 reviews with consistent reading and lecture themes across online and .

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 511
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1008 reviews
PHIL418 reviews
PHIL1335 reviews
PHIL402 reviews
POLSC0332 reviews
Show 3 more courses
PHIL0401 review
PHIL0411 review
POLSC331 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 12

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1