AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Edward Haven

PHIL041 · PHIL101 · PHILO41 · PHIL132 · PHIL2205 · PHILOSOPHY0100 · PHIL150 · PHIL110 · PHIL040 · PHIL40 · PHIL2206 · PHIL122 · PHIL100 · PHIL41 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
94.23%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Must-take philosophy professor if you , and real learning without a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious LecturesEasy ANo Costly TextbookInspirationalPaper Focused
  • Students overwhelmingly call him one of the .
  • , and few or no high-stakes tests.
  • Lectures are funny, passionate, and often life-changing for majors and GE students alike.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most students report A or A+ if , and papers; and accepts late submissions.

Nearly all evidence is in person; the one online review also calls him a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Philosophy ideas can be abstract, but he breaks them down clearly and .

In-person comments dominate; online also describes a laid-back, easy experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

as required, yet students say you can miss some classes, turn in late work, and still pass.

review; in-person is more attendance-aware but flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

and many call him the best professor they have ever had.

Recommendation is extremely strong in person; the single online review is also a full yes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students highlight generous grading, dropped assignments, late work accepted, and .

Format shift

Both the online review and .

Workload

Light

64/100

, and readings rather than crushing exams, though some sections assign many short essays.

Format shift

; overall still lighter than exam-heavy classes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Overwhelming praise for and inspire majors.

Format shift

In-person reviews drive this score; the online review is equally enthusiastic.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Many courses use papers, journals, and expositions with few or no tests; class discussion and participation matter.

Format shift

; online also stresses papers over perfect polish.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are almost uniformly glowing: hilarious lectures, free or , and high recommendation rates.

Main concern

A minority find structure loose or if they fall behind.

What students said

“Genuinely one of the .”
PHIL122
“Hands down the .”
PHIL100
“He is hilarious, kind, accessible, brilliant, gives wonderful advice, extraordinary lectures”
PHIL150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review , and excellent communication.

Main concern

Only one online sample, so format-specific claims stay limited.

What students said

“Prof. Haven is awesome!! Very laid back, a generous grader, and is more interested in .”
PHIL150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper- and journal-centered with flexible makeups and .

Few or No TestsShort PapersJournalsLate Work AllowedClass Chooses Weights

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

expositions, allow makeups, and sometimes let the class set grade weights.

No Tests OftenFour Papers PatternDrop Lowest WorkLate Work Allowed
“The class and .”
PHIL100
“He also allows if you weren't there, with .”
PHIL122

Online

The online review emphasizes generous grading and concept understanding rather than perfect papers; .

Concept-Focused PapersGenerous Grading
“more interested in ”
PHIL150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hands down the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (1 online, 49 in , and humor. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Genuinely one of the .”

😂 Lecture Energy

95/100

“He is hilarious, kind, accessible, brilliant, gives wonderful advice, extraordinary lectures”

🅰️ Easy A Path

86/100

“Easy class to get an A in as long as and expositions (papers).”

👍 Recommendation

95/100

“If you are going to take a philosophy class, I really recommend you take it with Edward Haven.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his prerecorded lectures are edited very well, almost like a youtube video
  • , and a great lecturer
  • He makes everything easy to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very laid back, a
  • Easy class to get an A in as long as
  • and four journals

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Ummmmm I love him!!!
  • truly cares about his students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with exceptional consistency, high detail, recent activity, and a 94 percent take-again signal make the profile highly reliable.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL10010 reviews
PHIL419 reviews
PHIL1226 reviews
PHIL1506 reviews
PHIL0415 reviews
Show 9 more courses
PHIL1103 reviews
PHIL0402 reviews
PHIL402 reviews
PHILOSOPHY-01002 reviews
PHIL1011 review
PHIL1321 review
PHIL22051 review
PHIL22061 review
PHILO411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

31

A+ 9 · A 20 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2