AI Rate Professor

Electrical Technology

Russell Pedersen

ETEC022 · ETEC030 · ETEC042 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a demanding, industry-rooted mentor and will speak up when stuck.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIndustry-experiencedChallenging thinkerCaring mentorProgram backboneInconsistent lab support
  • Most ETEC students , and real-world focus.
  • A , and slow grade posting.
  • and success favors students who ask questions early.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades span A to B- range; students who engage and study succeed, but the material is not trivial.

; one online review does not discuss grade ease.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Subjects are dense electrical topics that challenge thinking without being universally brutal.

In-person comments describe challenging dense content most clearly.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory for lectures and labs.

; in-person confirms the same.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and teaching skill despite a few harsh outliers.

In-person recommendation is strong; the single online review is cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but at least one student felt grades lagged and support was uneven.

Format shift

Online review implies grade-document caution; in-person mostly fair.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reading, labs, tests, and dense lectures create a solid moderate workload typical of ETEC.

Format shift

; online comment focuses on labs.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Strong majority praise clarity, care, and industry wisdom, offset by a .

Format shift

In-person experience is mostly excellent; online sample is one negative review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

66/100

Tests and labs drive evaluation with participation and structured guidelines.

Format shift

; online focuses on lab work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly celebrate him as a respected ETEC pillar who makes dense material make sense, with a and .

Main concern

Some report he skips lab walkthroughs and delays grades.

What students said

“This is the one professor you can make a connection with and you can feel how much he cares about your future.”
ETEC042
“Uncompromising, but an excellent guide to difficult and dense subjects.”
ETEC-030
“ ! Does not go through the we are tested on and takes forever to input grades.”
ETEC-022

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review is negative, warning to keep graded documents and stay on his good side.

Main concern

Limited support tone and advice to archive all graded work.

What students said

“You might be alright if you speak English well and stay on his good side as seen on previous reviews, apparently some students liked him very much. Beware and keep all your graded documents”
ETEC042

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize tests and .

Test heavyLabs gradedLecture-based understanding

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture understanding without stating open-book or Lockdown Browser.

Test heavyMath problems on testsLabs
“ on”
ETEC-022
“Uncompromising, but an excellent guide to difficult and dense subjects.”
ETEC-030

Online

Online review .

Lab work focus
“ .”
ETEC042

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the one professor you can make a connection with and you can feel how much he cares about your future.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He's a bright man who has a teaching style that challenges you to think every class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“Russ is one of the .”

⚠️ Support Gaps

25/100

“ ! Does not go through the we are tested on and takes forever to input grades.”

❤️ Mentorship

85/100

“ and will do everything he can to help you succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Always willing to help, clearly knows what he teaches very well and knows how to make it make sense to students.
  • Goes on occasional tangents that become life advice/wisdom.
  • He approaches things in a realistic standpoint rather than a theoretical one.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Uncompromising, but an excellent guide to difficult and dense subjects.
  • and structure.
  • takes forever to input grades.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very knowledgeable, questions are invited, doesn't make you feel like an idiot.
  • He loves to talk and tell you stories about his experience in the trade.
  • I have a lot of respect for him

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Ten recent reviews give useful but mixed signal with limited online evidence and a few sharp outliers.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ETEC0426 reviews
ETEC-0303 reviews
ETEC-0221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1