AI Rate Professor

Electrical Technology

Jeffery Schults

ETEC032 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture heavyTest heavyBusywork quizzesPoor explanations
  • non-experts
  • Overloaded students with
  • Grade hinged on few high-stakes tests while

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

One student earned a C after weeks of unrelated quizzes while .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Material felt opaque and the professor did not teach what the .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory with no indication it improved learning.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Quality rated 1/5 with and a strongly negative teaching experience.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Graded by few high-stakes items and the reported grade was a C.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Eight weeks of and test-heavy load.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

and content needed for the .

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Tags and comments stress tests over busywork quizzes that did not matter for the grade.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person , and quizzes that did not match midterm content.

Main concern

You may get a C even after weeks of busywork because .

What students said

“Doesn't know how to explain his subject in a way that makes any applicable sense to laymen, and also actively did not teach the knowledge needed for the midterm”
ETEC-032

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

while pre-midterm quizzes felt unrelated.

Test heavyMidterm-focusedGraded by few things

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person course used heavy testing; quizzes for 8 weeks did not prepare students for the .

Test heavyMidtermBusywork quizzes
“overloading with online quizzes for 8 weeks before the midterm, but it was busywork that had no relation to what was needed to know for the actual tests”
ETEC-032

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Doesn't know how to explain his subject in a way that makes any applicable sense to laymen, and also actively did not teach the knowledge needed for the midterm.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching clarity and misaligned assessments. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Clarity

10/100

“Doesn't know how to explain his subject in a way that makes any applicable sense to laymen”

📝 Misaligned Work

25/100

“busywork that had no relation to what was needed to know for the actual tests”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“actively did not teach the knowledge needed for the midterm”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't know how to explain his subject in a way that makes any applicable sense to laymen
  • actively did not teach the knowledge needed for the midterm

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • overloading with online quizzes for 8 weeks before the midterm
  • busywork that had no relation to what was needed to know for the actual tests

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed 2023 review exists, so patterns cannot be confirmed.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ETEC-0321 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values