AI Rate Professor

English

Laura Smyrl

ENG122 · ENGLISH123 · COS126 · ENGL122 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

, and little perceived learning for the pain.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming PapersConfusing InstructionsTough GraderMessy CanvasNot Worth It
  • Zero would-take-again signal with consistently low quality scores across English courses
  • Students cite massive reading and paper loads, vague or contradictory instructions, and harsh or
  • Attendance and daily work policies feel punitive while actual teaching of transferable writing skills is widely disputed

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even when students grind through huge paper loads, grades and and inconsistent.

Almost all grade and effort evidence is in-person; the single online review lacks a reported grade.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

High difficulty ratings and constant complaints about volume of essays, readings, and summaries.

Online also calls work hard and wordy; in-person stresses volume more.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple skip-class-you-will-not-pass tags and reports of Fs for missed days even with notice.

; online lists mandatory attendance once.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Would-take-again is effectively zero with and .

Online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tough grader tags, plagiarism accusations over cited work, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

So many papers, constant summaries, and experience.

Format shift

and heavy; in-person volume complaints are extreme.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students say she does not teach transferable writing, confuses instructions, and .

Format shift

Online notes poor proofreading; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and readings rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

; papers drive assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person sections are dominated by crushing paper and , and claims she does not teach transferable writing skills.

Main concern

Ridiculous and .

What students said

“Can confidently say I learned nothing during her class .”
ENGL122
“ amount of work she gives you”
ENG122
“ .”
ENG122

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online English course and confusing, with poor proofreading and rare Zoom meetings.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ . and and involve way too much detail.”
ENGLISH123

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and homework rather than formal exams; .

Paper HeavyNo Clear Exam FormatTurnitin Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework driven with heavy Turnitin reliance; formal exam policy is not clearly described.

So Many PapersTurnitin HeavyHomework Driven
“Relied too heavily on Turnitin .”
ENGL122
“ and asks for summaries for all of them”
ENG122

Online

The single online review does not describe exam proctoring or format; .

Wordy AssignmentsMonthly Zoom
“ . and and involve way too much detail. Only positive is that zoom calls are only once a month.”
ENGLISH123

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ amount of work she gives you”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (1 online, 10 in person), highlighting overwhelming workload and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

16/100

“This class is not designed for you to LEARN anything about college writing.”

📚 Workload Intensity

8/100

“ and asks for summaries for all of them”

👎 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“Hate her class so much! but does not qualify to teach”

Theme 1

📝

  • so
  • So many papers
  • hw page is messy and

Theme 2

⚖️

  • she is not a

Theme 3

🚫 About Taking the Class

  • Highly unprofessional

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven consistently negative reviews across years with detailed workload and pattern.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1226 reviews
ENGL1223 reviews
COS1261 review
ENGLISH1231 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1