AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Carol Carter

CHDEV010 · CHDEV095 · CHILDDEV010 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Prefer her in person if you like participation and flexibility; and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation mattersGet ready to readOnline grading delaysIn-person sweet and flexibleUnclear online rubrics
  • Online CHDEV095 students report slow grading, vague rubrics, and .
  • and boring off-topic lectures with required attendance.
  • Participation and ; online experience is clearly worse.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some call her an easy teacher with and , but online work is hard to decode and not a free A.

; in-person reviews more often call her easy and flexible.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is not extremely advanced, but reading load and .

Online difficulty ratings and comments are higher; in-person comments range from easy to moderately demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is mandatory or required for participation and that skipping risks failing.

Both formats mention mandatory attendance or ; evidence is strongest in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About half the ; praise is strong in person while .

In-person reviews are mixed-to-positive; both online reviews discourage taking the class online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student says she is a fair grader, but and .

Format shift

Online students report fair grades with ; in-person comments mention ease and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Reading and assignment volume show up often, though .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize heavy reading and ; .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and fun, but online delivery and some lectures are described as .

Format shift

In-person praise is stronger; online teaching quality is rated poor due to directions and responsiveness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments focus on assignments, budgets, reading, participation, and .

Format shift

Evidence is assignment-heavy in both formats with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students either praise her as sweet, flexible, and fun or criticize boring off-topic lectures with mandatory participation.

Main concern

Attendance and participation are required even when some students find class a waste of time.

What students said

“she is flexible and a ”
CHILD-DEV-010
“ but her class is a huge waste of time !”
CHDEV010

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe , and poor email follow-up, with one calling the experience awful despite a fair grade.

Main concern

Vague rubrics and multi-month grading delays leave students unsure what is expected.

What students said

“ .”
CHDEV095
“Assignments were not graded timely (2 months) which left me without a clue on what the professor was looking for in .”
CHDEV095

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment centers on assignments and participation.

Assignment focusedLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; grades seem tied to participation, attendance, and .

Participation basedHomework focused
“Shes a great teacher she loves to help others, shes really flexible with .”
CHDEV010

Online

Online reviews ; students mainly discuss assignment rubrics and .

Assignment focusedUnclear rubrics
“ .”
CHDEV095

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 . Credibility rating: Medium.

🌐 Online Delivery Risk

25/100

“Assignments were not graded timely (2 months) which left me without a clue on what the professor was looking for in .”

❤️ In-Person Care

80/100

“she is flexible and a ”

📌

28/100

“ but her class is a huge waste of time !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mrs. Carter is an amazing teacher.
  • Her class basically consists of her talking of off topic things.
  • her classes are really fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She luckily was a , but known more.
  • Shes an easy teacher but youre better off choosing a better professor who wont bore you
  • 3 years of 4.0 GPA's until this Professor! AWFUL!

Theme 3

🌐 About Online Experience

  • .
  • .
  • semester is over and still no answer from her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews span 2019-2022 with , but sample size is small and opinions diverge.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDEV0102 reviews
CHDEV0952 reviews
CHILD-DEV-0101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values