AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sarah Yoseph

MATH155 · MATH140 · MATH100 · MATH110 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
69.23%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you want a caring math teacher with and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringExtra credit availableUnclear explanationsHomework on completionStudents form study groups
  • Many students praise her as caring, patient, and .
  • A recurring complaint is that and .
  • Grades can be fair if you keep up, but real learning often depends on peer group chats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, so solid grades are reachable even when understanding is shaky.

and pass-with-an-answer ease; in-person comments also note help.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Math content ranges from light to challenging depending on course, but raw difficulty.

Online MATH155 and MATH110 comments report more confusion; some MATH140 in-person comments rate difficulty low.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others say no; tags also warn that skipping can hurt your grade.

Online reviews mix mandatory and optional attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students would take her again for care and support, despite repeated notes that .

In-person recommendations are warmer; online recommendations are split .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Students say she is not a tough grader overall, grades homework on completion, and .

Format shift

Online ; one tough-grader tag appears but is outweighed by lenient comments.

Workload

Light

68/100

as light or manageable, with only occasional lots-of-homework complaints.

Format shift

Most online MATH155 comments say load is low; one MATH110 online review reports more quizzes and projects.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

She is widely seen as caring and helpful, though clarity of .

Format shift

In-person teaching comments are stronger on clarity and care; online lectures .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and fair tests rather than one dominant mode.

Format shift

Online comments stress quizzes, homework, and tests; and less specifically.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person and hybrid-era reviews are , and genuinely caring, with several strong recommendations.

Main concern

and one COVID-transition student wanted more flexibility under stress.

What students said

“Prof. Yoseph was very helpful and she genuinely cares for her students.”
MATH110
“Super polite and very caring. She wants her students to succeed!”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

students love her sweetness and , but and the class only works with peer help.

Main concern

, so students rely on group chats to learn.

What students said

“she lectures on problems that dont look like the .”
MATH155
“the entire class had to come together to figure out the work.”
MATH155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as a fair challenge, with .

Fair challenge testsUnderstanding-based gradingExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and but do not clearly detail proctoring or open-book policy.

Extra creditTests mentioned
“the towards the end really helped with my grade.”
MATH110

Online

Online students describe fair challenge tests and ; reviews .

Fair challenge testsHomework completion gradingExtra credit
“ , but she grades to how much you understood what was needed to be done rather than correct answers.”
MATH155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Yoseph was a fantastic professor. Makes a lot of mistakes, but likes to be called out on it. Offers when you call her out.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting care, grading access, and lecture clarity. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“you can tell that she genuinely cares for her students.”

🧩

40/100

“she doesnt really let you LEARN what you need.”

🎯 Grade Accessibility

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and since it was an online course, it made things a lot more difficult.
  • .
  • and the towards the end really helped with my grade.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but she grades to how much you understood what was needed to be done rather than correct answers.
  • as long as you have an answer (sometimes) you will pass.
  • Just the right amount of homework.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Dont get me wrong she is super sweet!
  • Super polite and very caring.
  • this professor was very helpful. She wanted all the students to excel and pass the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across online and in-person formats from 2020-2022 show consistent themes of .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1405 reviews
MATH1555 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MATH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1