AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Brian Johnson

PHIL100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want an engaging, low-difficulty intro philosophy class with room to think creatively.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesHilariousParticipation mattersDiscussion-drivenCreative freedom
  • Students love his fun, discussion-heavy philosophy lectures.
  • Participation and creative writing drive .
  • but class feels easygoing and low-stress.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Both reviewers earned strong grades with low difficulty ratings by participating and writing freely.

Evidence comes only from in-person PHIL100 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Difficulty ratings of 1-2 and comments about easygoing lectures show light intellectual load.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

and praise lectures as amazing and fun.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Creative free writing and .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Light

78/100

Main work is discussions and open-ended writing rather than heavy problem sets.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students highlight hilarious, interesting lectures and genuine enjoyment of teaching.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Success hinges on participation and creative written work more than formal exams.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person PHIL100 is discussion-led, hilarious, and easy if you participate.

Main concern

and participation is expected.

What students said

“Made topics fun and left most of the lecture time up .”
PHIL100
“Amazing guy. Very interesting lectures. Allows you to freely write in your own unique way which really ignites creativity and critical thinking!”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize discussions and free-form writing more than formal closed exams.

Participation-focusedCreative writing

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on discussion participation and creative writing rather than high-stakes proctored exams.

Participation mattersFree-form writing
“Participate in ! Very easy going and understanding.”
PHIL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing guy. Very interesting lectures. Allows you to freely write in your own unique way which really ignites creativity and critical thinking!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting discussion-led teaching and low stress. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Made topics fun and left most of the lecture time up .”

👍

95/100

“He enjoys what he teaches and it reflects in his lectures.”

😄 Classroom Vibe

90/100

“Very easy going and understanding.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • Made topics fun
  • left most of the lecture time up

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Participate in
  • Very easy going
  • freely write in your own unique way

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two detailed in-person reviews from 2021-2022; consistent praise but tiny sample limits confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values