AI Rate Professor

Physics

Jane Dignon

PHSYC7478 · PHYSC005 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage and constantly chase missing grades; expect rigid policies and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow gradingNo late workLots of homeworkTough graderWrong answer keys
  • Online students report , and rigid late-work rules.
  • One newer review says the class is manageable if you double-check wrong .
  • Overall quality is very low with high difficulty and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student earned an A after vigilance, but others report D+/B+ with missing grades and .

Online reviews are much harsher on grades; the single non-online review is more optimistic.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty is high with lots of homework and .

Online reviews drive the hard-difficulty picture; one review calls it manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

Both online and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

and call the experience awful despite one defensive positive review.

Online reviews strongly advise against; one non-online review is more positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and wrong keys create harsh grading risk.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework and test-heavy tags appear across reviews.

Format shift

and the non-online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students describe lazy direction, ignored emails, and a miserable first-semester experience.

Format shift

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative; one non-online review is milder.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and in one course.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, exams, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person-tagged review (about her online class) says the course is manageable if and .

Main concern

can mark correct .

What students said

“Don't let the other ratings scare you. Her online class is very manageable.”
PHYSC005

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online physics sections are described as miserable: slow or , and high stakes.

Main concern

and policies show no grace for late or .

What students said

“She didnt even input 6 of after sending her numerous emails.”
PHYSC005
“She does not allow for graded no matter what the reason”
PHSYC7478
“This professor is lazy and wants things done a precise way without giving the right directions”
PHYSC005

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and ; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style.

Quizzes and examsAnswer keys sometimes wrongNo late or makeup work

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The single non-online review notes quizzes and exams with that are sometimes wrong and fixable by message.

Quizzes and examsAnswer keys sometimes wrong
“My only critique is the she made for a few quizzes and .”
PHYSC005

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and exams plus rigid no-late-work rules but .

Quizzes and examsNo late or makeup workWrong answer keys possible
“She does not allow for graded no matter what the reason”
PHSYC7478
“Just an awful experience in this class.”
PHYSC005

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just an awful experience in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (3 online, 1 in and policy themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“This professor is lazy and wants things done a precise way without giving the right directions”

👎 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ .”

⏱️

15/100

“She does not grade in a prompt manner no matter how many emails you send her.”

📌 Policy Rigidity

20/100

“She does not allow for graded no matter what the reason”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Don't let the other ratings scare you. Her online class is very manageable.
  • This professor is lazy and wants things done a precise way without giving the right directions
  • She shows no grace, mercy, or compassion for her students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She didnt even input 6 of
  • Lots of
  • Otherwise, easy class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • She does not grade in a prompt manner no matter how many emails you send her.
  • If you send a message she will fix it, she doesn't have an ego about it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews from 2021-2026 are detailed and directionally consistent on negatives, with one recent positive outlier and small sample size.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHYSC0053 reviews
PHSYC74781 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values