AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Vanessa Garcia

MATH0260160 · MATH37 · MATH012 · MATH12 · MATH026 · MATH50 · MATH037 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel at math and can teach yourself; majority report poor teaching and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTest heavySkips classTough graderSelf-study required
  • Most students , and poorly aligned with tests.
  • Frequent complaints about absences, phone use, and little help for struggling students.
  • A few claim easy grades or great lectures, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Many report failing-range tests and ; only occasional easy-grade sections.

; most in-person and the online review say hard.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Fast pace, weak explanations, and should.

Consistent across in-person majority; online also rates difficulty 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; missing class means missing large chunks of notes.

Mostly in-person mandatory; one in-person said no and one online yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

and repeated 10/10 would not take again language.

; lone online review is also negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and reports of most of the class scoring under 60 on tests.

Format shift

; online also tough grader.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of homework and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Dominant theme is , self-talk, absences, and little student support.

Format shift

Nearly all in-person and the online review are negative; one glowing outlier exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test heavy and lecture-test mismatch dominate student complaints.

Format shift

; online incomplete outcome.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

lectures, test-test disconnect, absences, and low pass rates on exams.

Main concern

Teaching yourself most of the material while .

What students said

“When we have tests around 95% of the class get just under 60% on the tests.”
MATH012
“She goes through the material very fast with .”
MATH37

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review is extremely negative, calling her a really bad teacher.

Main concern

Hostile tone and incomplete grade outcome.

What students said

“really bad teacher -0/10. hates everyone”
MATH037

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are hard and often misaligned with taught material; one easy section used a .

Test heavyPop quizzesTeach-test mismatchGroup final (one section)

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and frequently score poorly; .

Test heavyPop quizzesGroup final in one sectionTeach-test mismatch
“When we have tests around 95% of the class get just under 60% on the tests.”
MATH012
“the as a group.”
MATH026
“Teaches one thing but .”
MATH037

Online

Online review does not detail exam logistics beyond overall harsh experience.

Tough graderLots of homework
“really bad teacher -0/10. hates everyone”
MATH037

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If your naturally gifted at math then your fine, if you are like me and struggle with math then your screwed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (1 online, 11 in person), highlighting failed teaching alignment and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

20/100

“This professor is badddd at explaining math concepts, and she speeds through all of the material.”

📉

28/100

“When we have tests around 95% of the class get just under 60% on the tests.”

👎

15/100

“10/10 would not take again.”

📚

24/100

“You will be spending many hours outside of class teaching yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She only talks about herself, and when she is teaching she somehow finds a way to talk about herself.
  • She goes through the material very fast with .
  • Amazing attitude but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Teaches one thing but .
  • If you want an next math class? Choose another class.
  • Stressful class :(

Theme 3

⚠️ About Reliability

  • Skips class a lot!
  • she missed class at least 5 times.
  • constantly on her cell phone during class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews over many years with highly consistent negative themes and only one strong positive outlier.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH0373 reviews
MATH373 reviews
MATH0122 reviews
MATH0261 review
MATH02601601 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH121 review
MATH501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1