AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

John Conaty

ADJUS122 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid for online if you need responsive support; experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerReal-world casesTough graderUnresponsive onlineExperience in AJ fieldPolarizing
  • and strong AJ field experience.
  • The only recent online review reports disrespect, ignored emails, and .
  • With only three reviews across eleven years, the overall picture is unstable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The recent online student earned a B under a , and .

Online evidence is harsh; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content seems standard AJ material made interesting by real cases, not unusually simple or brutal.

Online difficulty was rated very high; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

but is not clearly described in older in-person comments.

Only the ; in-person evidence is missing.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Reported take-again is 0 percent, and the most recent review strongly warns others away despite older praise.

; the recent online review does not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and little student support.

Format shift

Strictness comes from the online review; .

Workload

Light

70/100

, and a final.

Format shift

Workload detail is mainly in-person; online comments .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Older students loved real-world storytelling, while the recent online student found him uncaring and unresponsive.

Format shift

In-person praise is strong but old; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Course weight centers on papers plus midterm and .

Format shift

Assessment structure is clearest in older in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Two older in-person reviews call him excellent, interesting, and full of real cases, with .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“EXCELLENT teacher! He has a lot of experience in the AJ field, and he understands his students.”
ADJUS122
“ ! He constantly talks about real cases that he has worked on which makes it SO interesting.”
ADJUS122

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The sole online review describes an unhelpful, disrespectful instructor who ignored emails and graded harshly.

Main concern

No support, delayed or ignored contact, and .

What students said

“The teacher was disrespectful and did not care for the struggles facing his students. He was unwilling to assist throughout the semester.”
ADJUS122

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is conventional exams and limited papers, with tests described as somewhat hard.

Midterm and finalTests a little hardFew graded items

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests that are a little hard, without proctoring details.

Midterm and finalTwo papersTests a little hard
“ .”
ADJUS122
“There's only 2 papers, a midterm, and a final.”
ADJUS122

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe exam proctoring or .

Tough graderGraded by few things
“He is a teacher that .”
ADJUS122

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The teacher was disrespectful and did not care for the struggles facing his students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, contrasting old in-person praise with recent online criticism. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“EXCELLENT teacher! He has a lot of experience in the AJ field, and he understands his students.”

👎 Recent Online Experience

20/100

“I attempted to contact him multiple times throughout the semester and, he would either completely ignore the .”

👍 Older Recommendation

80/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • constantly talks about real cases that he has worked on
  • EXCELLENT teacher! He has a lot of experience in the AJ field
  • unwilling to assist throughout the semester

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There's only 2 papers, a midterm, and a final

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews span 2010 to 2021, with sharp format and era conflict and almost no grade detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADJUS1223 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values