AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Christopher Wu

MATH0300373 · MATH155 · MATH30 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if you can learn independently from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads From TextbookLots of HomeworkHard TestsHigh Drop RateMixed Clarity
  • and textbook-reading lectures
  • and
  • Would-take-again signal

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Heavy homework, hard tests written at a high level, and , not casual effort.

Online review is harshly negative on workload; older .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty ratings and comments , and textbook-level lectures point to a demanding course.

Online and in-person both flag difficulty; and if you attend.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; in-person review stresses it is very important to attend.

Online explicitly mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

; praise exists from one student but is outnumbered by avoid warnings.

; one old in-person student enjoyed the class while the other did not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Hard tests above expected level and many failures or .

Format shift

Online and in-person both imply tough assessment; limited grade data overall.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, especially online.

Format shift

Online review stresses almost daily homework; .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Lectures often described as ; one outlier still finds him helpful in person.

Format shift

Online is very negative; in-person reviews conflict between great teacher and .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Heavy mix of frequent homework and focus.

Format shift

and tests; in-person also stresses both.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MATH30 reviews split between a helpful teacher who rewards attendance and , and .

Main concern

Hard, high-level tests and if .

What students said

“ , and a great teacher.”
MATH30
“Over half of the class dropped before the end of the semester”
MATH0300373

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MATH155 student says lectures read from the textbook, daily homework piles up, and .

Main concern

format feel unmanageable.

What students said

“The class is ”
MATH155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard and above level; reviews .

Hard TestsTest HeavyHomework Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

a higher level than peers expected; no proctoring tools mentioned.

Hard TestsIn-Person Exams
“ .”
MATH0300373
“The tests and , but you have to pay attention during lecture”
MATH30

Online

Online review flags test-heavy structure but .

Test HeavyHomework Heavy
“ so it gets tough when you have other assignments to do.”
MATH155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in person) , and mixed older praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ ”

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ !!!”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“ so it gets tough when you have other assignments to do.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and a great teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Over half of the class dropped

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Experience

  • I had him online because of the coronavirus pandemic
  • expects us to participate when we have no idea what the hell is going on
  • !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews spanning 2013-2020 with mixed formats and conflicting in-person .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH03003731 review
MATH1551 review
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values