AI Rate Professor

English

Cicely Young

ENG100 · ENG95 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

; class time feels wasted and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderNo Class ControlHarsh EssaysUnclear DeadlinesSkip Class Risk
  • All three reviews rate teaching quality at 1 with .
  • and .
  • Poor classroom management, cancelled classes, and slow or missing grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, so even strong effort often fails to yield an A.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students rate difficulty and heavy paper load, not just concepts.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Two of and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

One review said attendance was not mandatory, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every reviewer and described the class as a waste of time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Multiple students call her a useful feedback.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

About four essays including an 8-10 .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students describe no class control, cancelled meetings without notice, and lectures that .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Students report a , weak classroom control, and little payoff for attending.

Main concern

, and cancelled classes without notice.

What students said

“Professor Young is a terrible instructor. She has no control of her class, and you never knew when things were due.”
ENG100
“Simple instructions but ”
ENG100
“You would have to keep asking her for your grade”
ENG95

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and exam formats.

Essay heavyHarsh paper gradingLittle exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment is driven by multiple essays graded harshly with and slow grade return.

Multiple essaysHarsh essay gradingSlow grade return
“ , and .”
ENG100
“No matter how much effort you put into the without any feedback.”
ENG100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person and poor classroom control. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality Collapse

15/100

“Professor Young is a terrible instructor. She has no control of her class, and you never knew when things were due.”

⚖️

18/100

“No matter how much effort you put into the without any feedback.”

🚫

5/100

“If you showed up for class, you were just wasting your time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has no control of her class
  • you never knew when things were due
  • She also cancelled class a couple of times, and didn't even let us know

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , and
  • Simple instructions but
  • You would have to keep asking her for your grade

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's a very nice teacher but be aware
  • and soft spoken
  • This is where it became a problem for the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three detailed in-person reviews from 2017-2020, but they are highly , and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1002 reviews
ENG951 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values