AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

John McDermott

PE009 · KNAT033 · PEC126 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

workout experience; be cautious about online sections.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirational PE CoachParticipation CreditCaring InstructorFormat PolarizingLow Textbook Use
  • In-person PE students praise him as caring, inspirational, and flexible with accommodations.
  • Participation matters more than perfect performance.
  • One online review is harshly negative and undermines format confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

He gives credit for participating in any form and provides alternatives, so effort over perfection unlocks the grade.

Positive grade-friendliness evidence is in person; the online review is negative but lacks grade detail beyond B+.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

PE content is practical and supportive, though one class still pushes physical improvement.

In-person reviews read easy and encouraging; the online review claims high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while tags and another review imply skipping hurts.

In person is mixed; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

Two of three students strongly recommend him, both for in-person PE support.

In-person students are enthusiastic; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Participation-based credit and disability alternatives make grading approachable for most students.

Format shift

Online has a ; in person emphasizes care and credit for effort.

Workload

Light

68/100

No textbook and participation-focused PE work keep academic load low outside class activity.

Format shift

Online tags claim lots of homework; in person does not.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

they have had, despite one very poor online review.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is strong; online evidence is one harsh outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on participation and physical training rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize participation; exams are not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as positive, inspirational, and inclusive with credit for any meaningful participation.

Main concern

He will push you to train harder, so low-effort students may feel challenged.

What students said

“Mr. McDermott is the .”
PE009
“Pushes you comfortably to become better in physical exercises/ training.”
KNAT033
“He even gives alternatives for students with disabilities.”
PE009

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and paints him as disengaged.

Main concern

Student felt abandoned and said he just sits in a golf cart.

What students said

“he is the worst. just sits in a golf cart”
PEC126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews and instead stress participation credit and inclusive alternatives.

Participation basedNo textbookFlexible alternativesClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment appears participation-driven with and accommodations rather than high-stakes testing.

Participation creditClear grading criteriaAlternatives for disabilities
“he gives students credit for participating in any way, shape, or form.”
PE009
“Pushes you comfortably to become better in physical exercises/ training.”
KNAT033

Online

Online comments ; only a harsh overall judgment is present.

Lots of homework tagTough grader tag
“he is the worst. just sits in a golf cart”
PEC126

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. McDermott is the . He helps students work hard in a positive, inspirational way.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting strong in-person PE support and one negative online note. Credibility rating: Low.

💪

72/100

“Mr. McDermott is the .”

♿ Inclusive Participation

76/100

“He even gives alternatives for students with disabilities.”

⚠️ Online Warning

20/100

“he is the worst. just sits in a golf cart”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • positive, inspirational way
  • Caring

Theme 2

🏋️ About Class Experience

  • Pushes you comfortably to become better
  • credit for participating in any way, shape, or form
  • just sits in a golf cart

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews, split by format and quality, so conclusions rest on a very small sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

KNAT0331 review
PE0091 review
PEC1261 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values