AI Rate Professor

Physics

Antoinette Stone

PHYS120 · PHYS015 · PHYSICS15 · PHYS36 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already know physics well and can pass with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard to approachUnclear teachingTrick examsPop quizzesRead off PowerPoint
  • , and poorly prepared to teach.
  • , and .
  • One positive review says she is thorough if you attend and work hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Tough grading, little partial credit, and without prior mastery.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Even intro physics feels hard because and assessments do not reinforce each other.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Four of and describe teaching as rude or ineffective.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader tags, little partial credit, and .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Many papers, homework, labs, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common themes , and anger when students ask for help.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and exams with exams carrying harsh surprises.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

: late, unresponsive, rude when asked for help, and exams unlike practice work.

Main concern

Gets angry at questions and .

What students said

“she gets angry when students ask questions and ”
PHYSICS15
“ , and full of trick questions/methods”
PHYS015
“ ”
PHYS36

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often use trick methods and .

Trick questionsExams unlike homeworkPop quizzesLittle partial credit

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as unlike practice work and full of trick questions with little partial credit.

Trick questionsMismatch with homeworkPop quizzes
“ , and full of trick questions/methods”
PHYS015
“ . little partial credit.”
PHYS36

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she is a horrible, horrible "professor" she gets angry when students ask questions and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting teaching clarity and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“she reads right off powerpoint and you can barley hear her”

🚫 Help Access

20/100

“Says she cares about students but gets mad when ask for help in office hours”

📝

25/100

“ ”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Late a lot and
  • reads right off powerpoint

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • full of trick questions/methods
  • little partial credit

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • gets angry when students ask questions
  • Gets angry at students for asking for help
  • Dr. Stone values her students success

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five in-person reviews from 2016-2019 with detailed complaints and one positive outlier give moderate credibility.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHYS0152 reviews
PHYS1201 review
PHYS361 review
PHYSICS151 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2