AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jesus Gonzales

MATH160 · MATH026 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want clear lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkAccessible outside classHigh expectationsClearer than textbookGroup projects
  • Solid explainer who beats the textbook but sets high bar
  • ; algebra readiness matters

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

You still work for your grade; one student earned a D and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is manageable when explained well but still requires solid algebra and real effort.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; another said missing class hurts understanding.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; another would and a D grade.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

High expectations and ; D grade reported despite accessibility.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of .

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

and , though expectations feel high.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

and group projects drive the .

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

strong .

Main concern

and lab tutors may not help enough.

What students said

“a lot of the he uses in lectures”
MATH026
“He does a better job explaining then the textbook”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He does a better job explaining then the textbook, the textbook is so .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“He did a really good job teaching Discrete, he makes it somewhat easy to understand but you still got to work for your grade.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“a lot of the he uses in lectures”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“I think he is a good teacher but he has high expectations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does a better job explaining then the textbook

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you still got to work for your grade
  • I would make sure your algebra is fresh

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Two mixed 2018-2019 reviews with decent detail but small sample and split recommendation.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH0261 review
MATH1601 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1