AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Fred Blundell

STATS034 · MATH030 · MATH025 · MATH25 · MATH12 · MATH50 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are fully self-directed and have no other math options.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCannot explain clearlyTough graderSelf-teach requiredStrict homework formatAvoid if possible
  • Most students say he cannot teach or explain and .
  • You and self-study, but learning is weak.
  • A few older and , yet overall tone is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

, but tough or and weak teaching block easy As.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Material ranges from easy pass with and tests pile on.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly all comments warn students to switch or .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tagged as a exact format.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and tests matter, but the bigger issue is teaching clarity rather than sheer volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students say , and forces self-teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Test-heavy tags and redo or fail risk comments show exams drive outcomes more than rich instruction.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math is widely described as unclear and and weak instruction.

Main concern

Poor explanations and tough or .

What students said

“ . He has no business teaching.”
MATH50
“ , but terrible teaching methods.”
MATH25
“It's easy to pass but you probably won't learn anything.”
MATH12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and on redos versus tough grading.

Test heavyPossible test redosHomework format strict

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests carry weight; one older review notes redos, while and peculiar.

Test heavyHomework returned for formatPossible test redos
“ ”
MATH50
“Got to redo the tests and almsot impossible to fail.”
STATS034

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . He has no business teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, emphasizing avoid warnings and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

12/100

“AVOID! disclosure- I only went for the first class then switched math teachers.”

📘 Teaching Quality

22/100

“He cannot teach or explain.”

🛠️

48/100

“You must be self motivated in order to teach yourself this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Methods

  • He cannot teach or explain.
  • terrible teaching methods.
  • He isn't very good at explaining things.

Theme 2

📈 About Passing & Grades

  • It's easy to pass but you probably won't learn anything.
  • Got to redo the tests and almsot impossible to fail.
  • Is very strict on the

Theme 3

🙂 About Personality

  • but not a .
  • Cool guy and he speaks english so as a math teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years and courses consistently criticize teaching clarity despite one softer older review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH0251 review
MATH0301 review
MATH121 review
MATH251 review
MATH501 review
Show 1 more courses
STATS0341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values