AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Emmanuel Wreh

PRECAL40 · MATH040 · MATH34 · MATH30 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if and attend every session; otherwise many students strongly advise avoiding him.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarized reviewsKnows the materialUnorganized lecturesHigh drop ratesAttendance helps grades
  • Reviews split hard between students who learned well and those who call him the worst.
  • An A is possible if , and go to review sessions.
  • Common complaints include unorganized lectures, hard-to-follow speech, unused expensive book, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students earn A or A+ with and homework, but others fail or .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Average difficulty is high and several students describe hard material with little learning from lectures.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

while others do not, but showing up is repeatedly tied to passing.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About half the reviews strongly recommend him and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades range from A+ to F; effort and outside help can produce strong grades, but outcomes are inconsistent.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and is unused.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some call him wonderful and knowledgeable; , and unhelpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests and review sessions are central; homework and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

: some praise clear stats or precalc help, others report chaos, attitude issues, and .

Main concern

, and reports of poor clarity or attitude.

What students said

“Wreh is definitely not the but you will get an A as long you attend all his lectures and ask for clarification whenever you need it”
MATH30
“ .”
PRECAL40
“Very great statistics professor. He knows his stuff. .”
MATH34

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are manageable if you attend reviews and .

Tests with reviewsHomework requiredAttendance aids exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as easy if you attend review sessions and keep up with homework.

Review sessionsHomework-based readiness
“ as long as you attend the reviews. .”
MATH30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Difficult to understand what if anything he tries to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization between strong praise and strong warnings. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Polarized Teaching

48/100

“The . 1, he mumbles. 2, he gives attitude during 1 on 1 interactions.”

📚 Grade Path Exists

55/100

“you will get an A as long you attend all his lectures and ask for clarification whenever you need it”

👍 Conditional Praise

42/100

“Very great statistics professor. He knows his stuff. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He also motivates students.
  • Wonderful professor. He knows his stuff!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of . i got an A in this class
  • half the class dropped or took W
  • as long as you attend the reviews

Theme 3

⚠️ About Red Flags

  • the material excel
  • mandatory 200 dollar book that we don't use
  • if you want to actually learn.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed but older in-person reviews with strong polarization reduce consistency even though sample size is decent.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH0403 reviews
MATH342 reviews
401 review
MATH301 review
PRECAL401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1