AI Rate Professor

English

Margaret Seelie

ENGLISH221 · ENG104 · ENG221 · ENGL221 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Skip unless required; expect strict essay rules, busy work, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAll-or-Nothing GradingBusy Work HeavyMandatory AttendanceStrict Source RulesMixed Passion
  • essays.
  • Heavy busy work and .
  • One glowing review clashes with and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

As and high grades and little partial credit.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and limited approved sources make the intellectual load heavier than a typical composition course.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and she is anal about punctuality.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most students warn STEM transfers and others to pick and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and limited outside sources allowed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report lots of busy work, long sources, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

One student found her passionate and clear; and new-teacher inconsistency.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Course centers on major essays and handout-based writing rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

rigid essay source rules, heavy busy work, and all-or-nothing grading that frustrates many students.

Main concern

and long, limited sources with .

What students said

“ so beware of that. No lenience.”
ENGL221
“The , and the .”
ENG221
“Be ready to read and have a lot of busy work. She uses turnitin.”
ENG104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essay writing and Turnitin more than traditional exams, so .

Essay-FocusedTurnitinLimited Outside Sources

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and strict source limits rather than clearly described exams.

Essay-FocusedTurnitinLimited Outside Sources
“She uses turnitin. 3 major essays . she is not open for outsude sources, only what interests her.”
ENG104
“She gives you all the hand so it's hard to have an original opinion”
ENGLISH221

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you truly have to.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting grading strictness, busy work, and mixed teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

22/100

“ so beware of that. No lenience.”

📚 Busy Work Load

28/100

“Be ready to read and have a lot of busy work.”

😕 Teaching Clarity Split

42/100

“The , and the .”

❤️ One Strong Supporter

85/100

“I love Professor Seelie! I think she is really passionate about teaching and is always happy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but her sources for and boring.
  • She puts a lot of effort into her lectures and wants to make sure everyone gets it.
  • She's new so I don't think she knows what she's doing all the time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so beware of that. No lenience.
  • plenty of busy work too.
  • The .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Materials

  • she is not open for outsude sources, only what interests her.
  • She only has handouts no novels or books to buy. D2L heavy.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed 2015 reviews show mixed but and busy work; sample is small and dated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1042 reviews
ENG2211 review
ENGL2211 review
ENGLISH2211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1