AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Angel Juarez

CHEM06 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; both reviews describe a hostile, confusing CHEM06 experience with little learning payoff.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCondescendingUnclear LecturesInconsistent GradingTextbook MismatchNot Approachable
  • Both reviews rate him 1/5 and warn he talks down to students who ask for help.
  • Students say and marks work without giving correct answers.
  • Textbook does not match lecture and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

feedback, so earning a strong grade feels opaque and difficult.

All evidence is from in-person CHEM06 reviews only.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Content is treated as high difficulty because basics are poorly explained and lecture does not match the book.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Both students explicitly and teaching quality.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; work is marked wrong without answers or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Reviews focus more on tone and clarity than sheer volume, so workload .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say he is unapproachable, degrades question-askers, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

solutions, with textbooks required.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person CHEM06 is described as condescending, , and demotivating, with and a textbook that does not match lecture.

Main concern

Hostile tone when students ask questions and .

What students said

“This teacher is condescending to others, even when asked for help”
CHEM06
“His grading is inconsistent and ”
CHEM06

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

A curved grading scale is mentioned, but and .

Curve Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews mention a curve and point deductions on work, but .

Curve Mentioned
“He has a , and does not provide the correct answer”
CHEM06

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not take this professor. His grading is inconsistent and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person CHEM06 reviews, both strongly negative on tone and clarity. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ ”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ ”

🗣️ Classroom Tone

15/100

“This teacher is condescending to others, even when asked for help or have a question he speaks to students in almost degrading manner”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • condescending to others
  • talks down to his students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and does not provide the correct answer
  • Textbook does not match lecture

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two consistent but short 2015 reviews exist, so the yet sample size stays small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM062 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1