AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

James Carroll

2015SPMATH030 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; the sole review is strongly negative.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLow quality ratingHard math courseLab value questionedSingle-review profile
  • Only one review exists and it rates quality at 1 with difficulty 5.
  • Student says his teaching style is unlike others and .
  • Far too little evidence to treat him as a reliable recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Difficulty is maxed at 5 with a quality 1 review and no positive grade signals.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The only review pairs the course with maximum difficulty and little instructional value.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

comments.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The sole student rates him 1/5 and questions the usefulness of lab.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

No grade data, but extreme difficulty with low quality implies unforgiving outcomes.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Reviews do not .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Single review gives quality 1 and says lab can feel pointless.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mentions lab but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person math review reports poor teaching value and .

Main concern

Extremely thin evidence plus a very low quality score.

What students said

“this guy teaches like no other professor. .”
2015SPMATH030

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

that lab can feel pointless.

Lab mentioned
“ .”
2015SPMATH030

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“this guy teaches like no other professor. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with very limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“this guy teaches like no other professor. .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“this guy teaches like no other professor. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • this guy teaches like no other professor.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

One short 2015 review with no grade, tags, or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

2015SPMATH0301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values