AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Daniel Ramirez

PHIL2209 · PHIL002 · PHIL45 · PHIL2 · PHIL2LS · PHIL0117 · PHIL40 · PHIL02 · PHIL42 · PHILO040 · PHIL41 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if possible; and harsh classroom comments make philosophy painful for most.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude to StudentsUnclear AssignmentsCapricious GraderOff-Topic LecturesInsulting Feedback
  • Most students describe him as , and .
  • Essay and and harshly critical.
  • A small minority find him laid back and fair if you put in solid work.
  • and lectures can feel boring or off topic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Even A students report , and subjective essay standards.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

and high paper stakes make the course feel harder than necessary.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and stress showing up for quizzes and lectures.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Overwhelming majority and call him one of the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

as tough, feel-based, and without a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Papers, reading quizzes, and presentations form a solid but not endless load if you keep up.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

, and classroom tone insulting.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Papers and presentations carry most weight, with reading quizzes and some exams also used.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and lectures often called unclear, off-topic, or insulting.

Main concern

, and capricious grading that can tank strong students.

What students said

“he even spoke to me directly, saying I ”
PHIL2209
“I'm an A student all throughout my classes and he gave me my very first C and last C.”
PHIL2
“Assignments unnclear; .”
PHIL002

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Mix of papers, quizzes, and presentations; a few note exams are easier if you follow lectures.

Papers HeavyReading QuizzesPresentationsRelatively Easy Exams if Attentive

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and presentations dominate; exams are mentioned as relatively easy if you attend.

PapersReading QuizzesPresentationsLecture-Based Exams
“There are so read the book.”
PHIL40
“ if you pay attention to lectures”
PHIL41

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .. He goes off topic constantly, is very unclear about how he wants essays written.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“This Class was the , and this teacher was the ”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ . Don't be like me and risk taking him even with bad reviews”

⚖️

18/100

“ and . Doesn't grade on a ”

⚠️ Classroom Respect

15/100

“when i gave my presentation he insulted me and embarrassed me. He basically told me my opinion was wrong.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and concepts taught in class
  • He seems like an intelegent guy but,

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I'm an A student all throughout my classes and he gave me my very first C
  • if you make a the you get a C
  • Hard class. Just go to class and write the papers

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • he even spoke to me directly, saying I
  • he is RUDE
  • ramirez is a brutally honest person so make sure you can handle it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

21 detailed in-person reviews from 2005-2014 show a strong, consistent negative pattern on clarity and classroom tone.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

PHIL415 reviews
PHIL0024 reviews
PHIL23 reviews
PHIL402 reviews
PHIL01171 review
Show 6 more courses
PHIL021 review
PHIL22091 review
PHIL2LS1 review
PHIL421 review
PHIL451 review
PHILO0401 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1