AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Steve Narin

MATH025 · MATH75 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

older students loved him, but a recent report describes harsh, unsupportive behavior.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized reviewsSupportive for someTough grader riskReal-life math examplesBelittling reports
  • Older , and excellent at explaining math.
  • A recent review claims he belittled students and provided no support after the .
  • Evidence is sparse and sharply split, so risk is high despite some glowing praise.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

One review tags him as a , while older reviews describe easier, supportive math.

and easy; and high-difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty reports range from very easy support to a brutal 5 difficulty drop experience.

Online review rated difficulty low; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory with little flexibility detail.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Two glowing recommendations conflict with a .

Online and older in-person praise him; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

A recent Tough grader tag and .

Format shift

In-person recent evidence is harsh; online .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews say little about homework volume, focusing more on support versus harshness.

Format shift

Neither format gives strong workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

, and supportive, but one student reports belittling and zero help.

Format shift

Online experience is glowing; in-person experience is split.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One in-person student loved his humor and real-life examples; another dropped after reporting belittling and no support.

Main concern

Recent in-person review alleges personality change and .

What students said

“Provided no support and belittled students. His personality changed after the .”
MATH025
“He is a great teacher funny! sarcastic !1 and relates math to real life situations!”
MATH025

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One online student called him a .

Main concern

Only one online review, so supportiveness may not generalize.

What students said

“Mr. Narin is the best! After coming back to school after about 17 years he is a God sent. and will help you no matter what.”
MATH75

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students and grading tone.

Tough grader reportedLittle exam-format detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one stresses tough grading and no support.

Tough grader
“Provided no support and belittled students.”
MATH025

Online

Online .

“ and will help you no matter what.”
MATH75

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Provided no support and belittled students. His personality changed after the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 mixed online and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Polarized Experience

42/100

“Provided no support and belittled students. His personality changed after the .”

❤️

85/100

“Mr. Narin is the best! After coming back to school after about 17 years he is a God sent.”

🧮 Teaching Clarity When Good

80/100

“he will slow down to make !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • relates math to real life situations!
  • he will slow down to make !
  • and will help you no matter what.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Risk & Grades

  • Provided no support and belittled students.
  • His personality changed after the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews across years with extreme contradiction sharply lowers confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH0252 reviews
MATH751 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1