AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Beth Shrieve

RNURS036 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Proceed with caution; expect a tough clinical style and verify current reputation before enrolling.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough clinical instructorPolarizing personalityCan be fair or intimidatingNot approachable for some
  • Only two old reviews paint opposite pictures of the same nursing instructor.
  • One student found her tough but fair and engaging; another called her rude and unapproachable.
  • Course content is hard clinical work with limited grade or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Both reviews flag high difficulty with no easy-grade signals, so an A likely takes serious effort.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Nursing clinical and lecture content is described as tough and demanding.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One student would praise her fairness while another strongly rejects her as unapproachable.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

One review calls her very fair; the other implies harsh interpersonal treatment with no grade detail.

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Difficulty ratings and .

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

engaging and fair for one student, miserable and unapproachable for another.

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention clinical and lecture roles but .

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person clinical and and hostile personality.

Main concern

Personality clash risk and very limited recent evidence.

What students said

“Teacher is tough but very good! Kept my attention and I thought she was very fair (funny too)”
RNURS036
“She was rude, intimidating, mean, and just NOT an instructor anyone looked forward to having.”
RNURS036

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher is tough but very good! Kept my attention and I thought she was very fair (funny too)”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2014. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Polarizing Instructor

42/100

“This clinical / lecture instructor was not a very pleasant woman.”

🔥 Tough but Fair (for some)

45/100

“Teacher is tough but very good! Kept my attention and I thought she was very fair (funny too)”

📉 Approachability Risk

30/100

“She was NOT in the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teacher is tough but very good! Kept my attention
  • She was rude, intimidating, mean
  • She should not even have her job.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • I thought she was very fair (funny too)
  • I think she liked being miserable.
  • If she did not like you then YOU found out quickly enough.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two very old reviews with conflicting tone, no grades, and little policy detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

RNURS0362 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values