AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Rosa Armendariz

PHIL0001 · AE · PHIL001 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you want a soft philosophy class and can tolerate uneven teaching style.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPolarizingEasy A PossibleCommitted to StudentsCan Seem RudeInexperienced Feel
  • Reviews split hard between inspired and disappointed students.
  • Course content is generally easy and some call it an easy A.
  • Classroom manner and strictness draw strong criticism from others.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report low difficulty and one explicitly calls it an easy A due to weak enforcement of homework.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Average difficulty is low and comments frame the material as undemanding rather than deep.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

three reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

One glowing review is outweighed by disappointment over manners, experience, and wasted class time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Not strict enough with and described as an easy A by at least one student.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Workload

Light

76/100

Low difficulty ratings and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One student found her excellent and inspiring, but others report rudeness and inexperience.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments focus on homework habits and classroom work rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

one student felt inspired and supported, while two found her rude, condescending, or too lenient and disappointing.

Main concern

Personality and classroom management complaints can undercut the easy-course upside.

What students said

“She is truly committed to students and their success.”
AE
“She spoke to down to people and was rude.”
PHIL001
“Some people might like that it was an easy A, but it felt like a waste of time to me”
PHIL0001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No specific midterm or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Some people might like that it was an easy A, but it felt like a waste of time to me and I really was excited about taking this class and was hugely disapointed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting , and personality concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She spoke to down to people and was rude.”

🅰️ Easy A Signal

78/100

“Some people might like that it was an easy A, but it felt like a waste of time to me”

❤️ Student Support

70/100

“She is truly committed to students and their success.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great class and excellent professor!
  • She spoke to down to people and was rude.
  • She also spent more time talking about her acomplishments than encouraging the students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it was an easy A
  • She was inexperienced and not strict enough with students .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • left the class inspired, motivated and supported
  • I was disappointed by her mannerisms and her teaching.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed but older reviews (2012-2014) show mixed opinions with decent narrative depth and no grade data.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AE1 review
PHIL00011 review
PHIL0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values