AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Sue Shepardson

CHDEV0410278 · CHDV0278 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless required; students report and an .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear DirectionsTakes RollRepetitive ContentLate Work LimitedStudent Complaints
  • Both reviews rate quality low and describe frustration with .
  • and late work is only accepted within two weeks.
  • Course work feels hard and repetitive if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Higher difficulty ratings, perfection pressure, and student disappointment make an A feel effort-heavy.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students describe hard, repetitive work and difficulty relating material without infant or toddler job experience.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

She takes roll each class and tracks missed meetings, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Both reviews are low quality with complaints of and unbearable pressure.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and only accepts late work within two weeks.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report difficult coursework, repetition across related classes, and high assignment pressure.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Quality scores of 2 and 1 with open classroom complaints about unbearable expectations.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and relating work to personal experience.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

expected anyway, roll is taken, and related courses feel repetitive.

Main concern

Unclear homework plus perfection pressure creates high frustration.

What students said

“She keeps in mind if you miss a class and takes roll each class period.”
CHDV0278
“Teacher was and yet she wanted it to be perfect.”
CHDEV0410278

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessment talk focuses on homework.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher was and yet she wanted it to be perfect. Many students were disappointed and complained to her in class because it was unbearable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person , and heavy frustration. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Teacher was and yet she wanted it to be perfect.”

📋

18/100

“She keeps in mind if you miss a class and takes roll each class period.”

📚 Workload Friction

28/100

“If you take both 40 & 41 they are very repetitive.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teacher was and yet she wanted it to be perfect.
  • Many students were disappointed and complained to her in class because it was unbearable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She wants you to relate everything back to your experience.
  • She only takes late work within a two week period.

Theme 3

📅

  • She keeps in mind if you miss a class and takes roll each class period.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Two consistent negative reviews from 2013-2014 with concrete policy details, but the sample is small and old.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHDEV04102781 review
CHDV02781 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values