AI Rate Professor

English

Darcy Cohan

ENG21 · ENG121 · ENGL100 · ENG221 · ENGL221 · ENGL90 · ENGL10 · ENGLE221 · ENG100 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want to improve writing and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough Essay GraderWitty LecturesHeavy Writing LoadSlow To Return PapersEngaging Topics
  • Interesting, energetic English classes with witty lectures and strong writing practice
  • and slow; and writing load
  • Polarizing politics and communication issues for some students

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A and near-flawless writing, not minimal effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is college-level English with interesting topics, not brain-burner theory but substantial writing.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but participation and journals matter for grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Many recommend her for learning and energy; a and politics.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Students say she grades hard and .

Format shift

In-person only; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of reading, writing, weekly assignments, and multi-page essays.

Format shift

In-person only; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Enthusiastic, interesting lectures praised often; communication and fairness criticized by some.

Format shift

In-person only; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and papers more than traditional exams.

Format shift

In-person only; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and discussion; many love her energy while others resent hard grading and .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“the work load was high but she grades fairly and keeps you interested in the class with witty lectures.”
ENGL100
“ will suffer.”
ENG221
“I got an A, !”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly essays and journals with slow but .

Essay-HeavySlow Grading TurnaroundJournal Entries

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and journals; exams exist but writing dominates.

Major EssaysJournalsThorough Slow Feedback
“There was only 2 essays, 5 pg and 20 pg assignment.”
ENG100
“it takes but I believe that she is very thorough in grading”
ENGL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Darcy was great the work load was high but she grades fairly and keeps you interested in the class with witty lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews, highlighting witty teaching, heavy writing, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Energy

72/100

“I love the way Darcy works she's very enthusiastic and full of energy.”

📝 Essay Strictness

38/100

“She's incredibly picky about everything, and takes up to .”

👍 Learning Payoff

70/100

“If you want to learn .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • keeps you interested with witty lectures
  • gives very interesting topics
  • likes to curse...overall pretty cool

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A LOT of work
  • grades hard
  • I got an A... i had to work very hard for that mark

Theme 3

⚠️ Communication & Fit

  • terrible about responding to e-mail
  • takes forever to get your work back

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

18 mostly detailed in-person reviews from 2006-2014 show mixed but patterned views; sample is moderate and older.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1005 reviews
ENG2213 reviews
ENGL1003 reviews
ENG212 reviews
ENG1211 review
Show 4 more courses
ENGL101 review
ENGL2211 review
ENGL901 review
ENGLE2211 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values