Jose Lugo

MATHMATH · MATH012 · MATH30 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 12/100
RMP rating: 1.0/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 4.5

The decision

Avoid Jose Lugo; students say he confuses material and does not know how to teach.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDo not takeConfusingUseless instructorAvoid at all costsCannot answer questions

All four reviews rate quality 1 and urge avoidance
Students say he confuses simple concepts and cannot answer questions
Some pass by self-teaching via YouTube instead of lectures

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One A+ ; class itself is hard and poorly taught so an A still costs real effort outside class.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Difficulty ratings 3-5 and comments say he makes simple concepts indecipherable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; students advise tuning him out and using YouTube.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

One A+ reported but ; .

Format shift

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe pain and need to relearn everything outside class.

Format shift

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

All quality 1s; , and unable to answer questions.

Format shift

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Format shift

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Every in-person review rates him 1/5 and , and avoid-at-all-costs.

Main concern

Hopelessly ; .

What students said

“ .”
MATH012

“ ...HE'S A JOKE!”
MATH012

“This is a HORRIBLE teacher he is completely useless he doesnt know what hes teaching you at all.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews ; students focus on broken teaching, not exam rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ .”
Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting unanimous avoidance and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“This is by far the most useless instructor I've ever encountered.”

😵 Confusion Level

10/100

“ and make it indeciferable”

❓ Cannot Answer Questions

10/100

“When you ask him a question he gets stuck and doesnt know the answer.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

He does not know how to teach.
completely useless he doesnt know what hes teaching you at all

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

tune him out and look it up on youtube

Theme 3

💬 About Q&A Help

whenever you ask him a question he never knew how to answer it
When you ask him a question he gets stuck and doesnt know the answer

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four fully consistent negative reviews from 2012-2013 with strong detail and agreement.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH0122 reviews

MATH301 review

MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values