AI Rate Professor

English

Michael Cross

ACS10 · ENGLISH100 · ENG100 · ENGL100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Strong English 100 choice if you want real writing growth and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay rewriting allowedDetailed grammar coachFair and helpfulLoves to teachOccasional disorganization
  • Most students call him among the and .
  • He allows rewrites and keeps essay load moderate, which supports growth without crushing stress.
  • A minority report rudeness or disorganization, so personality fit still matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Rewrites and fair chances help, but and grammar work are still required for a top grade.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is college English with serious grammar and thesis work, not a free ride and not a brain burner.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

and help, with only a few advising against specific sections.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students can rewrite papers and say he gives everyone a fair chance to improve grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

as manageable for English 100.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

and grammar for most; a few cite vague directions or disorganization.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on essays, rewrites, and writing practice rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and grammar, allows rewrites, and is widely praised despite a couple of harsh outliers.

Main concern

One review flags rudeness and another notes disorganization and falling behind.

What students said

“He was the . .”
ENG100
“He only had us write 4 essays the entire semester and he if you're not happy with your grade.”
ENGL100
“He is a rude and unprofessional person.”
ACS10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course risk is mainly essay quality; no webcam or .

Essay-based assessmentPaper rewrites allowedNo proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

options; exam proctoring is not described.

Essay-based assessmentPaper rewrites allowed
“He only had us write 4 essays the entire semester and he if you're not happy with your grade.”
ENGL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person English reviews, balancing strong praise with outlier criticism. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Dr. Cross taught me things in GREAT detail that all of my teachers in high school skimmed on.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“If . He loves to teach.”

📝 Rewrite Policy

85/100

“he if you're not happy with your grade.”

⚠️ Personality Risk

25/100

“He is a rude and unprofessional person.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • drilled us Hard on Grammer and Making an amazing thesis
  • works with you
  • was a little vague with directions for essays

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • write 4 essays the entire semester
  • gives everyone a fair chance

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very nice and helpful
  • loves to teach
  • rude and unprofessional

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews from 2011-2013 show consistent praise with ; sample is modest and dated.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1003 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ACS101 review
ENGLISH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values