AI Rate Professor

English

Madeline Puccioni

ENG10 · ENG10S · ENGLISH10 · ENGL10S · ENGLISH10S · ENGL100 · CREATIVEWRITIN · ENGLISH100 · ENGL10 · ENGL230 · ENGL129 · ENG101 · ENGL30 · ENGLISH · ENG100 · CREATIVEWRITING · ENG112 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you can follow her directions exactly and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOpinionated GradingLots of WritingExtra CreditRude FeedbackBiased Topics
  • Many students call her biased, rude, or hard to please, especially in creative writing.
  • Doing the weekly essays and using can still produce a decent grade.
  • Classroom tone often feels political or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and do-the-work comments help grades, but and forced rewrites make an A less automatic.

All evidence comes from 21 in-person classified reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is often called not hard, but , and reading keep the course from feeling light.

All evidence comes from the 21 in-person classified reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

in-person classified set.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

A large share of students warn others away because of bias, rudeness, and .

Negative recommendation tone dominates the 21 in-person classified reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

helps some students, but many say grades hinge on matching her opinions and forced revisions.

Format shift

Based on the full in-person classified sample.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Weekly essays, rewrites, discussion posts, and reading are common, though some still call the class easy if work is done.

Format shift

Workload comments appear throughout the in-person classified reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Positive notes about charisma and are outweighed by complaints of rudeness, bias, and .

Format shift

Teaching quality is consistently uneven across 21 in-person classified reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades revolve , and more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Assessment focus is consistent across the in-person classified reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Twenty-one reviews show a polarizing English instructor: some pass easily with , while many , and forced revisions.

Main concern

and abrupt assignment changes create frustration even when the class is not hard.

What students said

“VERY biased. The quality of "education" being taught was terrible.”
ENGL100
“Lots of . I was able to pass with a very decent grade”
ENG10
“she tells you how to write your story. Your own ideas are simply not good enough.”
CREATIVEWRITING

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is assignment-heavy with essays and rewrites; and not clearly proctored in comments.

Weekly EssaysRewritesExtra CreditGrammar Test

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mainly , and occasional tests rather than strict proctored finals.

Weekly EssaysRewritesExtra CreditDiscussion Boards
“Be prepared to write an . Lots of too though.”
ENGLISH
“And the .”
ENGL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want a good grade, don't fight her on revisions. Fix your work to match her comments so she's happy and you'll pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting bias, assignment load, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

35/100

“She grades your assignments based on her opinion rather than the actual writing.”

📝 Forced Creative Control

30/100

“she tells you how to write your story. Your own ideas are simply not good enough.”

🎁 Path

60/100

“Lots of . I was able to pass with a very decent grade though English is my worst subject.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Rude, changes her mind 24/7, and enjoys embarrassing students in class.
  • Shes a pretty kool teacher that has charisma and makes the class less boring.
  • VERY biased.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Do the work and you will not have a problem.
  • Lots of .
  • As long as you do your work youll get a good grade, generally pretty easy

Theme 3

✍️ About Creative Writing

  • she tells you how to write your story. Your own ideas are simply not good enough.
  • to change one's work into what it was not is unacceptable.
  • If you want a good grade, don't fight her on revisions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews over many years show repeated themes of bias and , though the sample is older.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CREATIVEWRITIN2 reviews
CREATIVEWRITING2 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENGLISH102 reviews
ENG101 review
Show 12 more courses
ENG1011 review
ENG10S1 review
ENG1121 review
ENGL101 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGL10S1 review
ENGL1291 review
ENGL2301 review
ENGL301 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1001 review
ENGLISH10S1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values