AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

E Woodford

ADJUS926 · ADJUS042 · CORRECTIONS · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Worth taking for criminal justice knowledge if you will study hard, but be aware of .

Best fit · Effort For RewardSubject ExpertHeavy MaterialMixed ReviewsExam ReviewerGender Concern
  • Most students praise him as an excellent, knowledgeable instructor in justice topics.
  • Course material is substantial; studying .
  • One review raises a serious concern about how he treated women in class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Passing is doable if you study a lot of material; and not free A territory.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content volume is high and difficulty sits around moderate, especially for gang and justice topics.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most students push taking his classes for expertise and learning, offset by one strongly negative review.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Students say thorough study of heavy .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Comments emphasize a lot of material to study for exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Often called excellent and knowledgeable, with one sharp critique of style and classroom treatment.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

; he sometimes reviews test topics right before testing.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students largely call him excellent and content-rich, with one strong negative about teaching style and treatment of women.

Main concern

Uneven teaching style and a reported concern about treatment of women in class.

What students said

“Mr. Woodford is an excellent instructor. If you study all the material,(which it is a lot) .”
ADJUS926
“take this class! he's one of the best!”
CORRECTIONS
“I did not like how he treated the women in the class!!!”
ADJUS042

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

occasional last-minute review of test content.

In-Person ExamsPre-Test ReviewStudy Heavy Material

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; he sometimes reviews what is on the test beforehand.

In-Person ExamsPre-Test Review
“If you study all the material,(which it is a lot) . He sometimes reviews some of what's on the .”
ADJUS926

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Mr. Woodford is an excellent instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2011, highlighting expertise, workload, and one serious climate concern. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Mr. Woodford is an excellent instructor.”

📚 Content Depth

80/100

“In taking this class, I learned more than I could have ever imagined about gangs.”

⚠️ Classroom Concern

25/100

“I did not like how he treated the women in the class!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Woodford is an excellent instructor.
  • take this class! he's one of the best!
  • He is so kewl...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you study all the material,(which it is a lot) .
  • He sometimes reviews some of what's on the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • I have mixed feelings about this professor.
  • I did not like how he treated the women in the class!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four old reviews (2005-2011) with decent detail but limited sample and mixed consistency.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADJUS0422 reviews
ADJUS9261 review
CORRECTIONS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values