AI Rate Professor

Electrical Technology

Samantha Ward

ENGIN022 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a caring, accessible engineer teacher and can handle a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and AccessibleLots of HomeworkTough but FairOptional Class TimeGrace Periods
  • Students earn A/A+ with hard work and
  • ; she helps one-on-one during class hours
  • Workload is demanding with lots of

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students got A and A+, but and lots of homework, so the A takes real work.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Material is hard to grasp at first and difficulty ratings sit around 3-4 with a demanding workload.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

92/100

Both students and in-person periods are optional work time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

and praise her as intelligent, caring, understanding, and respected.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

yet students still earn As with , and grace periods.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Described as very demanding with lots of .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students call , and fun to work with.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Homework and assignment work dominate; in-person time is used as optional work periods.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENGIN-022 is demanding but supported: optional work-time classes, one-on-one help, grace periods, and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ but she's always there during the specified class hours and she'll help you work through the .”
ENGIN-022
“This class was very demanding in work, however she gave two day grace periods which I took advantage of a lot.”
ENGIN-022

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and ; exam format is not clearly proven.

Assignment focusedClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove exam format; .

Lots of homeworkClear grading criteriaGrace periods
“This class was very demanding in work, however she gave two day grace periods which I took advantage of a lot.”
ENGIN-022

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Ward is intelligent, insightful, and very caring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching support, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Professor Ward is intelligent, insightful, and very caring.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“This class was very demanding in work, however she gave two day grace periods which I took advantage of a lot.”

🗓️

92/100

“I never went to a single in person class because she designated those periods as !”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“Great teacher and very fun to chat with.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Ward is intelligent, insightful, and very caring.
  • she'll help you work through the .
  • if you are honest and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The material is hard to grasp at first
  • This class was very demanding in work
  • she gave two day grace periods

Theme 3

🗓️

  • she designated those periods as !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, and take-again data, but the sample is still small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGIN-0222 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values