AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Daniel Leeland

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; you will need outside tutoring and may face temper or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFails to teachTemper and cursingDrops students easilyNeeds outside tutoringParticipation heavy
  • Teaching quality is near-floor; students rely on tutoring center peers instead of him.
  • yet lectures and help are ineffective or hostile.
  • Students still report As, but and external help, not classroom learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Both reviewers earned As but only after heavy outside tutoring and despite weak in-class teaching.

All evidence is from in-person Math 2305 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

18/100

Difficulty is rated max; concepts and labs leave students lost without external help.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as mandatory in both reviews with no flexibility described.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students explicitly say NOPE and want him out of mathematics; .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

As were awarded, but and .

Format shift

In-person only; grades include A with harsh participation notes.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Tags and comments cite group projects, many papers, and labs many classmates skipped.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say he fails to educate, mumbles instead of helping, and shows a temper.

Format shift

Consistent .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation rather than classic exams.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Math 2305 is described as , and punitive, with students forced to learn from tutors rather than the instructor.

Main concern

Hostile help style, quick drops, and .

What students said

“Only reason I passed is because I went to tutoring provided by LMC to understand. Kids my age were teaching me he didn't.”
2305
“ and anything. NOPE”
2305

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews stress labs and group work more than formal exams, so .

LabsGroup projectsParticipation

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessment centers on labs, papers, and group work.

LabsGroup projectsParticipation matters
“Half of my class barley did labs due to his lack of educating/ failure to answer group questions we had as a class.”
2305

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Only reason I passed is because I went to tutoring provided by LMC to understand. Kids my age were teaching me he didn't.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews highlighting failed instruction and punitive climate. Credibility rating: Low.

💔 Teaching Quality

15/100

“His method is just not it. Half of my class barley did labs due to his lack of educating/ failure to answer group questions we had as a class.”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“ and anything. NOPE”

😤 Help Style

18/100

“When you need help he mumbles back and questions you instead of helping, leaving you wondering and wondering.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Kids my age were teaching me he didn't.
  • His method is just not it.
  • When you need help he mumbles back and questions you instead of helping

Theme 2

⚠️ About Behavior & Policy

  • he does have a temper and will curse at you if you were to turn something in late
  • and anything
  • I would like to see this teacher not in the mathematics section again

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

but tiny sample and limited time span.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

23052 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values