AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Linda DeMorales

CHEM2829 · CHEM1A85877 · CHEM1B · CHEM1A · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a supportive chemistry professor who rewards effort with and fair exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring Chem LecturerExtra Credit HeavyNotecard ExamsSupportive but ChallengingAmazing Lectures
  • Most students say she makes hard chemistry clearer with caring lectures and lots of support options.
  • , and notecards on exams boost grade recovery.
  • Chem remains challenging and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with homework, , and notecards, but many land in the B range and chemistry still demands study.

Almost all grade-path evidence is in-person; the single .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

She simplifies tough chem topics, yet multiple students still call the subject hard and lecture-heavy.

; one online review rated difficulty high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags warn that skipping class hurts.

In-person is clearly attendance-heavy; the one .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

About five in six would take her again, and many call her the .

Recommendation is overwhelmingly from in-person CHEM1A/1B with one positive online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Partial credit, , and notecards repeatedly appear, though a few older reviews call her tougher.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is almost all in-person; .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, and exams keep you busy, but load is rarely called overwhelming when you stay current.

Format shift

In-person and the one online review both emphasize homework-exam alignment more than busywork for its own sake.

Teaching experience

Excellent

82/100

Dominant theme is caring, clear, inspiring lectures that make chemistry make sense, with only a few harsh outliers.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strongest in person; the online review also calls her caring and encouraging.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

66/100

Exams and , and used to support exam performance.

Format shift

Online comment says quizzes and ; in-person adds notecards and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and fair, with notecards, , and lecture-plus-lab structure.

Main concern

Chemistry content is still hard; a minority say lectures are uneven or confidence-crushing.

What students said

“I've never given a review, made an account just to give Linda one. ... she is the .”
CHEM1A
“lets and gives partial credit”
CHEM1A
“ . trust me on this.”
CHEM1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online CHEM1B and exams, and some open-note exams.

Main concern

Difficulty rating was high and only one online review exists.

What students said

“The quizzes and . ... some exams were open note.”
CHEM1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because of notecards, partial credit, , and homework-aligned questions.

Notecards AllowedPartial CreditOpen Note Some ExamsExtra CreditStudy Guides

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students repeatedly mention notecards, partial credit, study guides, and .

Notecards on ExamsPartial CreditExtra CreditStudy Guides
“Can .”
CHEM1A
“lets and gives partial credit”
CHEM1A

Online

The only online review says some exams were open note and .

Open Note Some ExamsHomework-Aligned Quizzes
“The quizzes and . ... some exams were open note.”
CHEM1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've never given a review, made an account just to give Linda one. I have been to Uc's and I have to say she is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, mostly in-person chemistry courses, highlighting care, , and . Credibility rating: High.

🧪 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Never have I had an and passionate for what she does.”

🎯 Grade Supports

74/100

“Extra credit for attending review sessions that chem”

👍 Recommendation

86/100

“ if you need a chemistry class.”

📘

80/100

“lets and gives partial credit :)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes complex concepts understandable
  • Amazing lectures
  • she makes it fun too

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • chem is hard but she makes it simple and offers ALOT of
  • , if you do the
  • An A is possible, though many students average Cs

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • really cares about her students
  • extremely FAIR, has a passion to teach
  • Caring as well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews over many years with strong agreement on care, , and .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1B9 reviews
CHEM1A8 reviews
CHEM1A858771 review
CHEM28291 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1