AI Rate Professor

Communication

Brad Millar

COMMU1 · COMMCOMM · COMM8 · COMM1 · COMM2 · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
60.53%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want real speech growth and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderParticipation mattersBlunt humorSpeech-focusedClear expectations
  • many praise passion and clarity, others call him rude and harshly graded.
  • Speeches, participation, and .
  • , and expect blunt critique if you want a solid grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

, but and participation make an A effort-heavy.

Online has more recent easy-if-you-try notes; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is college speech/comm work, not abstract theory, but speeches and .

Both formats center speeches and participation; workload intensity varies by section.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation are graded; missing class or speeches tanks results.

In ; online still grades participation heavily.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

About 60% would retake; fans cite growth and humor, critics cite harshness.

Online recent reviews lean warmer; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

; some say he grades by feel on speeches.

Format shift

Both formats report tough grading; online adds grammar nitpicks.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Speeches, outlines, study guides, and reading can exceed a typical 3-unit load.

Format shift

; online still speech-heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and humor for many; arrogance and rudeness for others.

Format shift

Online students often call him cool; in-person is more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Speeches, participation, outlines, and .

Format shift

Both formats are speech and participation driven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students stress mandatory attendance, participation, lengthy study guides, and mixed views on fairness and attitude.

Main concern

and perceived arrogance turn some students off despite strong lectures.

What students said

“He was a great professor but .”
COMM1
“Do not ALWAYS use a he feels you deserve.”
COMM1
“To the people who think this class is hard, you obviously are not prepared for what college entails.”
COMM2

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online COMM1 mixes strong fans who call him cool and and low grades when work slips.

Main concern

Grammar/speech standards feel strict and camera or participation norms vary.

What students said

“As long as you try on your speech, you'll get an A.”
COMM1
“Very blunt, and is big grammar. I would highly .”
COMM1
“ but he does give if you do.”
COMM1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers graded speeches with finals.

Speech presentationsParticipation gradeStudy guidesQuizzes in some sections

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person focuses on live speeches, participation, and ; no consistent proctoring claims.

Live speechesParticipationStudy guidesPop quizzes in some sections
“Participation is key to passing.”
COMM1
“Despite this being a 3 credit class, I spent more time on HW for this class than my 5 unit classes!”
COMM1

Online

Online speeches and participation drive grades; . Reviews do not clearly prove Lockdown proctoring.

SpeechesOptional camera with ECParticipation
“ but he does give if you do.”
COMM1
“As long as you try on your speech, you'll get an A.”
COMM1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was a great professor but . He pushes you because he knows you could do better.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing praise for growth with . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

72/100

“ , and he tells you exactly what he is looking for.”

📝

32/100

“ ”

🗣️ Participation Pressure

18/100

“Participation is a grade in this class, and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hilarious & passionate about teaching
  • straight to the point and doesnt beat around the bush
  • Super cool guy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do your work, and you will pass
  • not an easy A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Personality

  • a bit rude at times
  • He loves to correct students when they are wrong
  • no filter

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with and both formats represented.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 513
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

COMM133 reviews
COMM213 reviews
COMM82 reviews
COMMCOMM1 review
COMMU11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 6 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1