AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Amy Bronswick-Mitchell

PSYCH2 · PSY38 · PSYCH · PSY202 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

some find her interesting, but recurring no-shows and weak .

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent attendancePolarizing instructorSyllabus changes oftenHomework can be hardHit-or-miss quality
  • Reviews split hard between love and strong dislike of teaching quality.
  • Multiple students report frequent no-shows and wasted class time.
  • not deeply valued.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

; homework can be hard and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content is sometimes called known or challenging, with but not extreme.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Professor herself often misses class without .

No-show .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

as interesting; and poor teaching.

Recommendation evidence is mixed and all in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; comments focus more on teaching reliability than grade harshness.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

full overwhelming-load language.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Polarized but serious complaints about no-shows, weak answers, syllabus changes, and time-wasting lower the overall experience.

Format shift

All seven reviews are in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Students mainly mention .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some praise interesting lectures while others report no-shows, anger at questions, changing syllabi, and wasted class time.

Main concern

Frequent unannounced absences and inconsistent teaching leave students feeling shortchanged.

What students said

“She would be a phenomenal teacher if she would JUST SHOW UP TO CLASS”
PSYCH2
“She's a terrible teacher! She doesn't know what she's talking about and wastes class time complaining about random crap in her life”
PSY38
“everything she teaches is already known and she can't answer simple questions”
PSY202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students discuss homework more than exams; .

“ ”
PSYCH2
“good teacher but ”
PSYCH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She would be a phenomenal teacher if she would JUST SHOW UP TO CLASS.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting no-shows, polarized quality, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Reliability

38/100

“Most of the time, there is no warning that she will not be there.”

👎

25/100

“ .”

📚

45/100

“ , but i'd recommend people to take the class”

⚖️ Polarized Quality

42/100

“I love this class! The instructor makes the information challenging but .”

Theme 1

🚪 and Reliability

  • JUST SHOW UP TO CLASS
  • Students just sit around waiting before realizing she will not show
  • this is a reocurring problem

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • horrible instructor
  • wastes class time complaining about random crap
  • she can't answer simple questions

Theme 3

📈 About Course Work

  • The instructor makes the information challenging

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven older mixed reviews with and quality, but no recent data and one empty comment.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYCH24 reviews
PSY2021 review
PSY381 review
PSYCH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values