AI Rate Professor

English

Andrea Henderson

ENG1A · ENG5 · ENGLISH1A · ENGL1AM4 · ENG1B · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
47.62%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you write constantly, chase office hours for clarity, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHeavy Writing LoadUnclear InstructionsCaring Office HoursPolarizing English
  • Workload and harsh or
  • Students who use office hours often report clearer guidance and stronger support
  • Experience varies widely by section and year, producing a true depends profile

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Strong grades require constant writing, format precision, and often office-hour clarification; many say A is hard to secure.

Online and unclear; some in-person students still report reachable As with effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

English composition content itself is standard college level, but volume and ambiguity raise the felt difficulty.

and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

and optional in others; participation and discussions still matter.

; online is frequently optional but still assignment-driven.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half would take her again, usually those who used support and followed directions closely.

Positive recommendations cluster with office-hour users; sections.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

harsh cuts, format stickler rules, and inconsistent criteria.

Format shift

Online comments ; some in-person students call criteria clearer.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and short turnarounds create a high writing volume.

Format shift

Heavy load appears in both formats and intensifies in short sessions.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Some students find her respectful, clear, and supportive; others find instructions contradictory and .

Format shift

In-person support stories are stronger; online guidance complaints are louder.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and weekly writing rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper- and discussion-centered.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and tough graders with heavy papers and confusing expectations.

Main concern

Essay rubrics and grade expectations can feel inconsistent or harsh.

What students said

“Professor Henderson was really helpful and kind. She made everything easy to understand and .”
ENG1A
“Grading felt inconsistent, with .”
ENG5
“she over loads you with assignments”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online English sections often feel stressful with , and .

Main concern

Instructions and .

What students said

“The workload was overwhelming, assignments felt repetitive, and .”
ENG1B
“ . She assigns so much work per week acting as if she's the only class that .”
ENG5
“Professor Henderson was amazing and .”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing-heavy with major papers and discussions; reviews do not clearly prove proctored exams.

EssaysDiscussion PostsAPA Format PapersPeer ReviewNo Clear Proctored Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation rather than documented closed-book exams.

EssaysPeer ReviewGroup WorkParticipation
“Engaging topics with and a .”
ENG5
“She likes to have peer review. Bring extra copies of written assignments”
ENG5

Online

Online work is mostly essays and discussions with heavy weekly writing; .

EssaysDiscussion PostsWeekly Writing
“expected students to undertake enormous writing loads while offering no guidance”
ENG1B
“gives a final paper worth 20 points only and its required to be 10 pages”
ENG5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can. Overall, this class was just bs than learning for me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 English reviews across online and and grading complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Professor Henderson was really helpful and kind. She made everything easy to understand and .”

📝

28/100

“The amount of work in this course is insane. , and .”

👍 Support When Sought

70/100

“If you need help doing any of the assignments all you have to do is ask and .”

👎 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ ! if you can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and break down the
  • relied on
  • Really cares about her students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • SHE WAS A
  • You will NOT get an A
  • by following directions and trying. Learned a lot

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • assign a ridiculous amount of work in one week
  • Lots of homework
  • short time for assignments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews over many years show a stable polarizing pattern but a smaller sample and format split lower confidence than larger sets.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 58
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews
ENG58 reviews
ENG1B6 reviews
213511 review
ENGL1AM41 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 8 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 3