AI Rate Professor

English

Susan Andrien

ENG252 · ENG1A · ENGL5 · ENG5 · ENGLISH1A · CLASS · ENGL1AM13 · 2001A · 201A · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
44%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can self-manage in a disorganized discussion-heavy class and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedCaringLate feedbackPop quizzesDiscussion heavy
  • and an easy pass if you show up and participate; and hard to learn from.
  • , and off-topic political or personal discussions.
  • Recent reviews trend more negative on organization and teaching clarity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many As if you participate and revise, but and .

Online reviews are more positive; As.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is not advanced, but , and unpredictable class structure make it uneven.

In-person comments dominate; some call workload .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Attendance and participation are frequently mandatory; quiet students are warned they may struggle.

Mostly from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Would-take-again near 44% with a and organization critics.

Online sample is tiny and positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

Often accepts late work and passes willing students, but .

Format shift

Leniency appears mainly in older in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Some semesters have only a few essays; others report lots of reading, papers, and pop quizzes.

Format shift

Workload reports conflict across years and sections.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Warm and caring for many, but frequent complaints about disorganization and off-topic lectures lower the experience.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Papers, discussions, informal writing, and participation drive .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

older students praise compassion and easy As; recent students report , and .

Main concern

, and class time spent on unrelated talk.

What students said

“The class is extremely unorganized, and she .”
ENG1A
“as long as you show up and show that your willing, she'll pass you”
ENGL5
“The worst professor in Merritt College.”
ENG5

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Two online reviews are positive, citing inspiration, extra help, and caring support.

Main concern

Tiny online sample; older in-person tech and organization issues may still matter.

What students said

“Susan Andrian is one of the .”
ENG1A
“Offered extra help on her own time. Really cared about her students.”
ENGL1AM13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and consistent exam policy.

Pop quizzesPapers and discussionsFew formal examsParticipation based

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and participation, with recent warnings about random pop quizzes and .

Pop quizzesSo many papersLate gradingParticipation matters
“A and random pop quizzes”
ENG1A
“She's also if she feels the class is not participating enough”
ENG1A
“Doesn't keep track of grades and .”
ENG5

Online

Online comments ; focus is on feedback and support.

Feedback heavySupportive help
“Her lectures are amazing. She is talented when it comes to writing English composition and motivates her students as well.”
ENG1A
“Offered extra help on her own time. Really cared about her students.”
ENGL1AM13

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“as long as you show up and show that your willing, she'll pass you”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews (2 online, 29 in . Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“Susan really cares about her students in a human way.”

📂 Organization Issues

35/100

“The class is extremely unorganized, and she .”

🅰️ Pass If Present

58/100

“as long as you show up and show that your willing, she'll pass you”

⚖️ Mixed Recommendation

44/100

“ if possible. and far from engaging.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Sometimes it relates to the class discussions, but a lot of the time it didn't feel like an English class
  • class devolve into her yapping about what's on her mind
  • She is inspirational, compassionate and understanding.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy going, easy A, easy final-helpful class.
  • and likes to pile up students' paper
  • as long as you show up and show that your willing, she'll pass you

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • SO UNORGANIZED!!!!
  • Doesn't grade papers-- I turned in 10 assignments within the last two months
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-one reviews over many years show a durable split between caring/easy-pass and .

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1A13 reviews
ENGL1AM134 reviews
ENGL54 reviews
ENG53 reviews
201A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG2522 reviews
2001A1 review
CLASS1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 7 · A 8

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2