AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Grace Idowu

MEDAS201B · HLTOC201 · MEDAS101 · MEDICALASSIST · MEDAS · MEDAS101AB · MEDTE001 · MEDAS201A · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
31.58%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid if you have another MEDAS instructor option; organization and communication are the main risks.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedHarsh DeliveryUnclear ExpectationsProgram GatekeeperPolarizing
  • Most , and stressful grading processes.
  • A minority praise deep clinical knowledge and high standards for medical assisting.
  • Even students who earn As often say the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many reported As, but students say grades can swing sharply and require constant grade monitoring.

Both formats show As are possible; process stress is higher than content hardness.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content itself is often called not hard; confusion and organization problems create the challenge.

Online and while delivery is messy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and several warn that missing class hurts you.

attendance data.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and the majority of detailed comments urge students to skip her sections.

; online is also negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students report , and little trust in .

Format shift

Harsh process complaints appear in both formats.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and reading are common, but the bigger burden is confusion and rework rather than pure volume.

Format shift

Online mentions easy assignments made hard by chaos; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Knowledge is sometimes praised, but organization, clarity, and professionalism complaints dominate.

Format shift

In-person has both glowing and scathing reviews; online is mostly poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and program tasks; .

Format shift

; newer reviews focus less on format detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and professionalism, with a smaller set praising knowledge and high standards.

Main concern

, and stressful class climate.

What students said

“As bad as it gets.”
MEDAS
“ ”
MEDAS201A
“ .”
HLTOC201

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative about organization, email response, and .

Main concern

and slow or missing responses online.

What students said

“ . - Taking a long time to grade and fix quizzes. - Never answer student's emails.”
MEDAS101AB
“Shes so unclear and gives everyone a .”
MEDAS201A
“Disorganization makes learning harder than necessary.”
MEDAS201B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam practices vary by term, with and others noting pop quizzes or shifting dates.

Take-Home TestsPop QuizzesInconsistent Timing

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and easy exams, while others cite pop quizzes and shifting dates.

Take-Home TestsPop QuizzesChanging Exam Dates
“The quizzes and .”
MEDTE001
“ .”
HLTOC201
“changed the dates of quizes/exams”
MEDAS

Online

Online comments mention and .

Quiz Fixes DelayedUnclear Online Assessment
“Taking a long time to grade and fix quizzes.”
MEDAS101AB

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please don't torture yourself and kill your brain cells by having to even breathe the same air as this lady.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, mostly in-person medical assisting courses. Credibility rating: High.

🗂️ Organization

30/100

“ .”

😠 Classroom Climate

28/100

“Extremely rude-accuses you of not doing things correctly”

👎 Recommendation

30/100

“ .”

📘 Knowledge Praise

70/100

“very knowledgable instructor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Rarely delivers a coherent lecture
  • Should really consider retiring
  • eager to share knowledge and good at doing so

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • my grade would drop from an A to an F over 1 assignment
  • class is not by any means hard
  • easy A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Program Logistics

  • Its been almost a year & I STILL haven' been able to get a placement
  • Links and videos for modules and HW don't work
  • you must get things in writing

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five reviews over many years show a durable negative majority with enough detail and consistency to rate credibility high.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MEDAS201A13 reviews
HLTOC2013 reviews
MEDAS201B3 reviews
MEDAS2 reviews
MEDAS1011 review
Show 3 more courses
MEDAS101AB1 review
MEDICALASSIST1 review
MEDTE0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 5 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3